judicial-watch

USA v. Application For A Warrant By Telephone Or Other Reliable Electronic Means: Warrant Issued

26-mj-00039
Active Court order issued Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

A federal magistrate judge issued a warrant allowing law enforcement to obtain information by telephone or other electronic means. This warrant is part of a larger investigation, but the details of the case are not publicly available. The warrant's issuance indicates that the government has probable cause to believe a crime has been committed.

Latest development

2:26-mj-00039-1 USA v. Application For A Warrant By Telephone Or Other Reliable Electronic Means

Order · April 30, 2026

A federal magistrate judge issued a warrant allowing law enforcement to obtain information by telephone or other electronic means. This warrant is part of a larger investigation, but the details of the case are not publicly available. The warrant's issuance indicates that the government has probable cause to believe a crime has been committed.

description View filing
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.

update What Changed This Week

1 event

Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

1 event
gavel
Order April 30, 2026

2:26-mj-00039-1 USA v. Application For A Warrant By Telephone Or Other Reliable Electronic Means

A federal magistrate judge issued a warrant allowing law enforcement to obtain information by telephone or other electronic means. This warrant is part of a larger investigation, but the details of the case are not publicly available. The warrant's issuance indicates that the government has probable cause to believe a crime has been committed.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

1 article
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

1 outlet · 1 article

Timeline events

1 record on file

Last updated

3 days, 20 hours ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.