newspaper
1:22-cv-01919 LEOPOLD v. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY et al
Status Report ( 59
May 8, 2026
1 min read
civil-litigation
administrative-law
federal-courts
US RIGHT TO KNOW v. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
25-cv-02144
D. Colo.
Advertisement
description
Case Summary
The attorney for Cloud303, Inc. withdrew from the case Cloud303, Inc. v. Wonder AI Inc. (1:25-cv-02144) in the US District Court for the District of Columbia. This means the attorney is no longer representing the plaintiff in the case. The withdrawal is likely due to a change in the attorney's schedule or a decision to no longer pursue the case.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
smart_toy
Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records.
How we verify our work.
fact_check
Docket Snapshot
account_balance
Court
D. Colo.
District of Colorado · 10th Circuit · CO
tag
Docket
Not captured
Civil
timeline
Stage
Active litigation
Active
event
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
new_releases
Latest Filing
1:22-cv-01919 LEOPOLD v. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY et al
Other · May 08, 2026
newspaper
Coverage
3 articles
2 sources tracked
groups
Participants
2 Defendants, 2 Plaintiffs
5 linked entities
gavel
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to District of Colorado, a federal district court in CO.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 08, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, Wonder AI Inc, 1:25-cv-02144 US RIGHT TO KNOW and others.
Press monitoring has found 3 related articles from 2 distinct sources.
chronic
Updated 1 day, 7 hours ago
The Story So Far
US RIGHT TO KNOW v. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY is an active civil matter in District of Colorado under docket 25-cv-02144.
The dispute currently identifies 1:25-cv-02144 Cloud303, Inc and 1:25-cv-02144 US RIGHT TO KNOW on one side and CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY and Wonder AI Inc on the other. Juryvine classifies the matter around civil litigation, administrative law, federal courts.
The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.
On May 8, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The parties filed a joint status report. On May 5, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The attorney for Cloud303, Inc. withdrew from the case Cloud303, Inc.
v. Wonder AI Inc. (1:25-cv-02144) in the US District Court for the District of Columbia.
This means the attorney is no longer representing the plaintiff in the case. The withdrawal is.
The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.
smart_toy
Juryvine case narrative generated from the full docket timeline.
How we verify our work.
About This Court
District of Colorado (D. Colo.) is a federal district court in the 10th Circuit, CO.
Advertisement
Case Timeline
3 events
info
Other
May 8, 2026
1:22-cv-01919 LEOPOLD v. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY et al
The parties filed a joint status report.
info
Other
May 5, 2026
1:25-cv-02144 Cloud303, Inc. v. Wonder AI Inc.
The attorney for Cloud303, Inc. withdrew from the case Cloud303, Inc. v. Wonder AI Inc. (1:25-cv-02144) in the US District Court for the District of Columbia. This means the attorney is no longer representing the plaintiff in the case. The withdrawal is likely due to a change in the attorney's schedule or a decision to no longer pursue the case.
info
Other
May 4, 2026
1:25-cv-02144 US RIGHT TO KNOW v. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
The parties filed a joint status report.
Advertisement
newspaper
3 articles
Press Coverage
newspaper
1:25-cv-02144 Cloud303, Inc. v. Wonder AI Inc.
Withdraw as Attorney ( 36
May 5, 2026
1 min read
newspaper
1:25-cv-02144 US RIGHT TO KNOW v. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
Status Report ( 11
May 4, 2026
1 min read
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
2 outlets · 3 articles
Timeline events
3 records on file
Last updated
1 day, 7 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.