1:24-cv-07829 United States of America v. Various Fiat Currency With An Approximate Value Of $2,300,000 Seized On Or About May 20, 2021, et al
Scheduling Order ( 34
United States of America v. Various Fiat Currency With An Approximate Value Of $2,300,000 Seized On Or About May 20, 2021, et al is a civil case with a docket number of 24-cv-07829. The court has not been specified. The current summary is a Scheduling Order with 34 attachments. The case involves United States of America and Various Fiat Currency With An Approximate Value Of $2,300,000 Seized On Or About May 20, 2021, et al, but the specifics of the charges and the court's actions are unknown.
Latest development
Order · April 22, 2026
The court issued an order.
description View filingThe United States of America v. Various Fiat Currency With An Approximate Value Of $2,300,000 Seized On Or About May 20, 2021, et al is a civil case with a docket number of 24-cv-07829. The court has not been specified.
The case involves the United States of America and Various Fiat Currency With An Approximate Value Of $2,300,000 Seized On Or About May 20, 2021, et al, but the specifics of the charges and the court's actions are unknown. On April 22, 2026, the court issued an order, but the details of the order are not publicly available.
The case is currently active, but no judge has been assigned. The court has issued a Scheduling Order with 34 attachments, but the specifics of the order and its implications are unclear. The case will likely move forward with the assignment of a judge and the resolution of the Scheduling Order.
The next development to watch will be the judge's assignment and the scheduling of further proceedings. The court's order on April 22, 2026, may provide additional insight into the case's progress and the court's expectations for the parties involved.
The case's outcome will depend on the court's interpretation of the law and the evidence presented by the parties. The United States of America will likely argue that the seized currency is subject to forfeiture, while the defendant will argue that the currency is not subject to forfeiture or that the seizure was unlawful.
The case will likely involve complex legal and factual issues, and the court's decision will have significant implications for the parties involved and for the law more broadly. The case is ongoing, and further developments will be reported as they become available.
Scheduling Order ( 34
Open original open_in_newJuryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
The court issued an order.
Scheduling Order ( 34
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 1 article
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
22 hours, 17 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.