United States of America et al v. University of Southern California
Case Summary
A new lawsuit, De Los Santos v. United States of America et al, was filed in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, referencing the ongoing case United States of America et al v. University of Southern California. The lawsuit appears to be related to the same underlying issues. The exact nature of the lawsuit is unclear at this time.
Latest development
2:24-cv-06774 NIZIOL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
Order · April 30, 2026
The court issued an order.
description View filingDocket Snapshot
Court
S.D.N.Y.
Southern District of New York · 2nd Circuit · NY
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
1:24-cv-08489 De Los Santos v. United States of America et al
Other · Apr 30, 2026
Coverage
6 articles
3 sources tracked
Participants
3 Defendants, 3 Plaintiffs
9 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to Southern District of New York, a federal district court in NY.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated April 30, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes University of Southern California, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, United States of America and others.
Press monitoring has found 6 related articles from 3 distinct sources.
update What Changed This Week
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more
Order 60-Day Administrative Termination ( 28
Open original open_in_newJuryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
About This Court
Southern District of New York (S.D.N.Y.) is a federal district court in the 2nd Circuit, NY.
Case Timeline
6 events1:24-cv-08489 De Los Santos v. United States of America et al
A new lawsuit, De Los Santos v. United States of America et al, was filed in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, referencing the ongoing case United States of America et al v. University of Southern California. The lawsuit appears to be related to the same underlying issues. The exact nature of the lawsuit is unclear at this time.
2:26-cv-04316 Nicholas Drake Dunahoo v. University of Southern California et al
A Notice of Interested Parties was filed.
2:24-cv-06774 NIZIOL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
The court issued an order.
1:26-cv-03548 Saleh et al v. United States of America et al
A new civil case, Saleh et al v. United States of America et al, was filed in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, with the University of Southern California listed as a defendant. The case involves a civil cover sheet, which is a standard document filed at the beginning of a lawsuit. This filing marks the start of the case.
2:25-cv-16693 SMITH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
A Notice of Call for Dismissal was filed.
2:18-cv-08311 United States of America et al v. University of Southern California
The court issued a scheduling notice in the case United States of America et al v. University of Southern California, indicating that a text-only notice has been filed. This notice is a procedural step in the case, providing information about the next steps and deadlines. The notice is a routine part of the court's process.
Press Coverage
2:26-cv-04316 Nicholas Drake Dunahoo v. University of Southern California et al
Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties ( 2
2:24-cv-06774 NIZIOL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
Order 60-Day Administrative Termination ( 28
1:26-cv-03548 Saleh et al v. United States of America et al
Civil Cover Sheet ( 3
2:25-cv-16693 SMITH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
Notice of Call for Dismissal ( 3
2:18-cv-08311 United States of America et al v. University of Southern California
Text Only Scheduling Notice
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
3 outlets · 6 articles
Timeline events
6 records on file
Last updated
22 hours, 11 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.