appeals appeal federal-courts

SDNY Bank of America Case on Appeal to USCA

25-cv-05007 S.D.N.Y.
Active Appeal in progress Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

Underwood v. Bank Of America Corporation is a case filed in the Southern District of New York. The case was filed on an unspecified date and has a docket number of 25-cv-05007. The current summary of the case is that USCA appeal fees were filed, indicating that the case is on appeal to the US Court of Appeals.

Latest development

1:25-cv-05007 Underwood v. Bank Of America Corporation

Appeal · April 29, 2026

The US Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit has ordered Underwood to pay the appeal fees for the case Underwood v. Bank Of America Corporation. This means that Underwood must now cover the costs associated with appealing the lower court's decision. The appeal fees are a standard requirement for pursuing an appeal in federal court.

description View filing

Key Issues

  • USCA Appeal Fees
  • Appeal to US Court of Appeals
  • Bank Of America Corporation
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

S.D.N.Y.

Southern District of New York · 2nd Circuit · NY

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Appeal in progress

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

1:25-cv-05007 Underwood v. Bank Of America Corporation

Appeal · Apr 29, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

1 article

1 source tracked

groups

Participants

1 Defendant

1 linked entity

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to Southern District of New York, a federal district court in NY.

The newest docket activity we have is a appeal dated April 29, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes Bank Of America Corporation.

Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.

chronic

The Story So Far

Updated 5 days, 1 hour ago

Underwood v. Bank Of America Corporation is an active appellate matter in Southern District of New York under docket 25-cv-05007.

The dispute currently identifies 1:25-cv-05007 Underwood on one side and Bank Of America Corporation on the other. The case is currently organized around Issues preserved for appellate review, Appellate posture and standard of review, Pending motions, orders, and near-term docket movement.

The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.

On April 29, 2026, the docket recorded a appeal: The US Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit has ordered Underwood to pay the appeal fees for the case Underwood v. Bank Of America Corporation. This means that Underwood must now cover the costs associated with appealing the lower court's decision.

The.

The next thing to watch is whether the latest appeal produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.

smart_toy Juryvine case narrative generated from the full docket timeline. How we verify our work.

About This Court

Southern District of New York (S.D.N.Y.) is a federal district court in the 2nd Circuit, NY.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

1 event
arrow_upward
Appeal April 29, 2026

1:25-cv-05007 Underwood v. Bank Of America Corporation

The US Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit has ordered Underwood to pay the appeal fees for the case Underwood v. Bank Of America Corporation. This means that Underwood must now cover the costs associated with appealing the lower court's decision. The appeal fees are a standard requirement for pursuing an appeal in federal court.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

1 article
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

1 outlet · 1 article

Timeline events

1 record on file

Last updated

4 days, 9 hours ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.