appeal

Akoma v. New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation: Appeal Record Sent to USCA

23-cv-10181
Active Appeal in progress Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

The appeal record in Akoma v. New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation has been sent to the US Court of Appeals (USCA). This is a procedural step in the appeal process, where the record of the lower court's proceedings is transmitted to the appellate court for review. The next step will be for the USCA to schedule oral arguments or issue a decision.

Latest development

1:23-cv-10181 Akoma v. New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation et al

Appeal · April 27, 2026

The appeal record in Akoma v. New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation has been sent to the US Court of Appeals (USCA). This is a procedural step in the appeal process, where the record of the lower court's proceedings is transmitted to the appellate court for review. The next step will be for the USCA to schedule oral arguments or issue a decision.

description View filing
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.

update What Changed This Week

1 event

Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

1 event
arrow_upward
Appeal April 27, 2026

1:23-cv-10181 Akoma v. New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation et al

The appeal record in Akoma v. New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation has been sent to the US Court of Appeals (USCA). This is a procedural step in the appeal process, where the record of the lower court's proceedings is transmitted to the appellate court for review. The next step will be for the USCA to schedule oral arguments or issue a decision.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

1 article
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

1 outlet · 1 article

Timeline events

1 record on file

Last updated

1 day, 9 hours ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.