Transcript regarding Hearing Held 3/25/2026 THIS TRANSCRIPT WILL BE MADE ELECTRONICALLY AVAILABLE TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC 90 DAYS AFTER THE DATE OF FILING. TRANSCRIPT RELEASE DATE IS 07/1/2026. Until that time the transcript may be viewed at the Clerk's Office or a copy may be obtained from the official court transcriber. Court Reporter/Transcriber Dipti Patel/Liberty Transcripts, Telephone number (847) 848-4907. Tape Number: Status Conference. (RE: related document(s) 189 STATUS CONFERENCE HELD

The court held a status conference on March 25, 2026, to address ongoing case management issues in the dispute involving Ecube Labs Co and El Paso Disposal. The transcript of this hearing will not be immediately available to the public. Instead, it will be released 90 days after filing, with a scheduled public release date of July 1, 2026.

Until then, interested parties may review the transcript at the clerk’s office or obtain a copy directly from the official court transcriber, Dipti Patel of Liberty Transcripts. This delay in public access is standard procedure for certain court transcripts. The case remains active but has not yet been assigned to a judge.

The docket does not currently list a specific case number or court, which suggests early procedural stages. The status conference likely focused on procedural matters, including the pending motion filed by El Paso Disposal to extend the automatic stay protecting Ecube Labs Co.

That motion was filed on May 14, 2026, the same day Ecube Labs Co initiated the complaint that opened the case. The timing indicates the parties are still working through foundational litigation steps.

The absence of a judge assignment and limited docket information points to a case still in its infancy, with the court managing scheduling and procedural issues before substantive rulings. The public will gain fuller insight into the court’s discussions once the transcript becomes available in July.

Until then, the case’s trajectory depends on how the court rules on the automatic stay extension and other early motions. The case’s procedural posture suggests a focus on preserving the status quo while the parties sort out their claims and defenses.