legal-news

Thompson v. Loreal USA, Inc. et al

26-cv-04891
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

The court has consolidated the case of Thompson v. Loreal USA, Inc. et al with 3:26-cv-04891 HOUGHTON et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al. This consolidation will allow the two cases to be heard together, potentially streamlining the litigation process. The consolidation is significant because it may reduce the overall cost and time required to resolve the cases.

Latest development

4:26-mj-70528-1 USA v. Thompson

Order · April 29, 2026

The court issued an order.

description View filing
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.

update What Changed This Week

1 event
gavel
Order 4 days ago
The court issued an order.
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more

Stipulation and Order ( 6

Open original open_in_new

Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

8 events
info
Other May 1, 2026

3:26-cv-04891 HOUGHTON et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al

The court has consolidated the case of Thompson v. Loreal USA, Inc. et al with 3:26-cv-04891 HOUGHTON et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al. This consolidation will allow the two cases to be heard together, potentially streamlining the litigation process. The consolidation is significant because it may reduce the overall cost and time required to resolve the cases.

info
Other April 29, 2026

1:26-cv-04931 Hardy v. L'Oreal USA, Inc. et al

The court granted a motion to consolidate Thompson v. Loreal USA, Inc. et al with Hardy v. L'Oreal USA, Inc. et al, effectively combining the two cases into one. This consolidation will streamline the litigation process and reduce duplicate efforts. The combined case will now proceed under the docket number 1:26-cv-04931.

info
Other April 29, 2026

1:26-cv-04928 Wright v. L'Oreal USA, Inc. et al

A new case, Wright v. L'Oreal USA, Inc. et al, was filed in the same court as Thompson v. et al, indicating a potential class action lawsuit against L'Oreal USA, Inc. This development may impact the Thompson case, as it could lead to a larger collective action against the company.

info
Other April 29, 2026

6:24-cr-00081-1 USA v. Thompson

The court transferred the case of USA v. Thompson out of the Southern District of New York (SDNY) to the Eastern District of New York (EDNY) for further proceedings. This transfer is related to Thompson's probation or supervised release. The exact reason for the transfer is not specified.

gavel
Order April 29, 2026

4:26-mj-70528-1 USA v. Thompson

The court issued an order.

info
Other April 29, 2026

1:26-cv-04905 Wynn v. L'Oreal USA, Inc. et al

A new case, Wynn v. L'Oreal USA, Inc. et al, was filed in the federal court system, potentially affecting the ongoing case Thompson v. et al. The new case may impact the legal scene for L'Oreal USA, Inc. and its related parties. The exact nature of the new case is unclear at this time.

info
Other April 29, 2026

1:26-cv-04891 Thompson v. Loreal USA, Inc. et al

The court granted a motion to seal certain documents in the Thompson v. Loreal USA, Inc. et al case. This means that the sealed documents will not be publicly available. The court's decision allows the parties to protect sensitive information.

info
Other April 29, 2026

1:26-cv-04890 Buford v. Loreal USA, Inc. et al

A new case, Buford v. Loreal USA, Inc. et al, was filed in the Southern District of New York (SDNY) with the case number 1:26-cv-04890. This case is related to Thompson v. et al, suggesting a potential consolidation or connection between the two cases. The exact nature of the relationship is unclear at this time.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

8 articles
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

4 outlets · 8 articles

Timeline events

8 records on file

Last updated

4 days, 14 hours ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.