newspaper
legal-news
Thomas v. Chen et al
25-cv-02287
Advertisement
description
Case Summary
Thomas v. Chen et al is a civil case with a current docket number of 25-cv-02287. The case involves a declaration filed on 19 pages. The court has not been specified.
Latest development
1:22-cr-00446-1 USA v. THOMAS
Hearing · April 23, 2026
A Motion was filed.
description View filingKey Issues
- • declaration
- • unknown court
smart_toy
Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records.
How we verify our work.
update What Changed This Week
1 event
groups
Hearing
1 day ago
A Motion was filed.
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more
Motion Hearing ( 28
Open original open_in_newJuryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
Advertisement
Case Timeline
4 events
info
Other
April 23, 2026
3:25-cv-06071 Aylo Premium Ltd v. Chernov et al
An affidavit was filed.
groups
Hearing
April 23, 2026
1:22-cr-00446-1 USA v. THOMAS
A Motion was filed.
info
Other
April 23, 2026
1:25-cv-10235 Doe v. McHenry et al
The court ordered the redaction of a 74-page transcript in the case of Doe v. McHenry et al, which is related to the case of Thomas v. Chen et al. This action is likely to protect sensitive information from being publicly disclosed. The redacted transcript will be made available to the parties involved in the case.
info
Other
April 23, 2026
1:25-cv-02287 Thomas v. Chen et al
The court granted leave to file a document in the case of Thomas v. Chen et al, allowing the parties to proceed with their filing. This decision is significant because it enables the parties to move forward with their case. The document in question is likely a key piece of evidence or a key filing that will impact the outcome of the case.
Advertisement
newspaper
4 articles
Press Coverage
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
4 outlets · 4 articles
Timeline events
4 records on file
Last updated
16 hours, 8 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.