Court stays deadlines after parties notify settlement with TransUnion LLC
Case Summary
The court issued an order staying all deadlines after the parties notified it of a settlement with defendant TransUnion LLC. The parties must file a stipulation for dismissal or a joint update on settlement finalization by July 6, 2026.
Latest development
Text-Only) ORDER in Response to 30 Notice of Settlement. The Court has received notice from the parties that this matter has settled between Plaintiff and Defendant TransUnion LLC. The parties are directed to file a
Order · May 10, 2026
Judge Douglas issued an order.
Key Issues
- • Settlement agreement
- • Stay of deadlines
- • Dismissal procedure
Docket Snapshot
Court
Court not identified
Awaiting court metadata
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Court order issued
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
Text-Only) ORDER in Response to 30 Notice of Settlement. The Court has received notice from the parties that this
Order · May 11, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
1 Presiding Judge, 1 Related Organization
2 linked entities
Judge
Douglas L. Micko
What the record shows
The court metadata has not been resolved yet, so Juryvine is keeping the page conservative until a reliable court match lands.
The newest docket activity we have is a order dated May 11, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Douglas L. Micko and others.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
The Story So Far
The parties in this case have reached a settlement with Defendant TransUnion LLC, as confirmed by Magistrate Judge Douglas L. Micko on May 6, 2026. The court has stayed all deadlines related to TransUnion pending finalization of the settlement.
The parties must submit either a stipulation for dismissal or a joint status update on the settlement process by July 6, 2026. This directive pauses active litigation against TransUnion while the settlement is finalized. The case remains active but is effectively on hold with respect to TransUnion until the court receives the required filing.
Judge Micko’s order reflects the court’s standard procedure to monitor settlement progress and ensure timely resolution. The docket does not currently list other defendants or related deadlines, focusing solely on TransUnion’s status. The next key step will clarify whether the settlement leads to dismissal or if further court involvement is necessary.
update What Changed This Week
receipt_long Source expand_more
Text-Only) ORDER in Response to 30 Notice of Settlement. The Court has received notice from the parties that this matter has settled between Plaintiff and Defendant TransUnion LLC. The parties are directed to file a stipulation for dismissal or a joint update on the settlement finalization process on or before July 6, 2026. All deadlines are stayed with regards to Defendant TransUnion. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Douglas L. Micko on 5/6/2026. (CRD) (Entered: 05/06/2026
Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
Case Timeline
1 eventText-Only) ORDER in Response to 30 Notice of Settlement. The Court has received notice from the parties that this matter has settled between Plaintiff and Defendant TransUnion LLC. The parties are directed to file a stipulation for dismissal or a joint update on the settlement finalization process on or before July 6
Judge Douglas issued an order.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
22 hours, 8 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.