legal-news

Tannehill et al v. Village of Merrionette Park et al: Stipulation Filed

25-cv-07990
Active Court order issued Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

The court granted an extension of time for the plaintiffs in the Tannehill et al v. Village of Merrionette Park et al case, allowing them more time to file their next motion. This extension is significant because it gives the plaintiffs additional time to prepare their case. The extension was granted on the docket number 1:25-cv-07990.

Latest development

3:25-cv-07990 Phoenix Assurance Company et al v. The Roman Catholic Bishop of Santa Rosa

Order · April 29, 2026

The court issued an order.

description View filing
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.

update What Changed This Week

1 event
gavel
Order 4 days ago
The court issued an order.
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more

Stipulation without Proposed Order ( 42

Open original open_in_new

Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

2 events
gavel
Order April 29, 2026

3:25-cv-07990 Phoenix Assurance Company et al v. The Roman Catholic Bishop of Santa Rosa

The court issued an order.

info
Other April 28, 2026

1:25-cv-07990 Tannehill et al v. Village of Merrionette Park et al

The court granted an extension of time for the plaintiffs in the Tannehill et al v. Village of Merrionette Park et al case, allowing them more time to file their next motion. This extension is significant because it gives the plaintiffs additional time to prepare their case. The extension was granted on the docket number 1:25-cv-07990.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

2 articles
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

2 outlets · 2 articles

Timeline events

2 records on file

Last updated

4 days, 2 hours ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.