SWINT v. ECHOSTAR
Case Summary
The plaintiff, SWINT, filed a letter in the case SWINT v. ECHOSTAR (2:26-cv-04668) indicating that the filing fee or an in forma pauperis (IFP) application is due. This means that SWINT must either pay the required court filing fee or submit a request to proceed without paying the fee. The court will now wait for SWINT to take one of these actions.
Latest development
2:26-cv-04668 SWINT v. ECHOSTAR
Filing · April 28, 2026
The plaintiff, SWINT, filed a letter in the case SWINT v. ECHOSTAR (2:26-cv-04668) indicating that the filing fee or an in forma pauperis (IFP) application is due. This means that SWINT must either pay the required court filing fee or submit a request to proceed without paying the fee. The court will now wait for SWINT to take one of these actions.
description View filingupdate What Changed This Week
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more
Letter: Filing Fee or IFP due ( 3
Open original open_in_newJuryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
Case Timeline
2 events2:26-cv-04668 Santibanez v. Kang
A Summons was issued.
2:26-cv-04668 SWINT v. ECHOSTAR
The plaintiff, SWINT, filed a letter in the case SWINT v. ECHOSTAR (2:26-cv-04668) indicating that the filing fee or an in forma pauperis (IFP) application is due. This means that SWINT must either pay the required court filing fee or submit a request to proceed without paying the fee. The court will now wait for SWINT to take one of these actions.
Press Coverage
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
2 outlets · 2 articles
Timeline events
2 records on file
Last updated
1 day, 12 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.