legal-news

SWINT v. ECHOSTAR

26-cv-04668
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

The plaintiff, SWINT, filed a letter in the case SWINT v. ECHOSTAR (2:26-cv-04668) indicating that the filing fee or an in forma pauperis (IFP) application is due. This means that SWINT must either pay the required court filing fee or submit a request to proceed without paying the fee. The court will now wait for SWINT to take one of these actions.

Latest development

2:26-cv-04668 SWINT v. ECHOSTAR

Filing · April 28, 2026

The plaintiff, SWINT, filed a letter in the case SWINT v. ECHOSTAR (2:26-cv-04668) indicating that the filing fee or an in forma pauperis (IFP) application is due. This means that SWINT must either pay the required court filing fee or submit a request to proceed without paying the fee. The court will now wait for SWINT to take one of these actions.

description View filing
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.

update What Changed This Week

1 event

Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

2 events
info
Other April 30, 2026

2:26-cv-04668 Santibanez v. Kang

A Summons was issued.

description
Filing April 28, 2026

2:26-cv-04668 SWINT v. ECHOSTAR

The plaintiff, SWINT, filed a letter in the case SWINT v. ECHOSTAR (2:26-cv-04668) indicating that the filing fee or an in forma pauperis (IFP) application is due. This means that SWINT must either pay the required court filing fee or submit a request to proceed without paying the fee. The court will now wait for SWINT to take one of these actions.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

2 articles
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

2 outlets · 2 articles

Timeline events

2 records on file

Last updated

1 day, 12 hours ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.