The Supreme Court has sided with Nessel in the Line 5 jurisdiction dispute. The specifics of the decision are not publicly available. This decision may have significant implications for the jurisdiction of the Line 5 pipeline, and may affect the rights of various parties involved.
Latest development
Media Coverage · April 23, 2026
The US Supreme Court has ruled unanimously in favor of Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel in a jurisdiction dispute over the Line 5 pipeline. Nessel argued that Enbridge Energy waited too long to move the lawsuit from state to federal court. This ruling may revive Nessel's case to block the pipeline's use.
newspaper Read articleSupreme Court has unanimously ruled in favor of Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel in her argument against Canadian company Enbridge Energy. Nessel contends Enbridge waited too long to ask a judge to move a lawsuit over their twin oil and natural gas pipelines on the bed of the Straits of Mackinac to federal court from state court. Justices heard oral arguments less than two months ago in the case and the ruling might revive Nessel’s case in Ingham County that seeks to block Enbridge from usi
Open original open_in_newSupreme Court sides with Nessel in Line 5 jurisdiction dispute
Open original open_in_newJuryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
The US Supreme Court has ruled unanimously in favor of Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel in a jurisdiction dispute over the Line 5 pipeline. Nessel argued that Enbridge Energy waited too long to move the lawsuit from state to federal court. This ruling may revive Nessel's case to block the pipeline's use.
The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel, determining that the state has jurisdiction over a dispute related to the Line 5 oil pipeline. This decision reverses a lower court's ruling and gives Michigan more control over the pipeline's operation. The ruling has significant implications for the state's ability to regulate the pipeline's environmental impact.
Supreme Court has unanimously ruled in favor of Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel in her argument against Canadian company Enbridge Energy. Nessel contends Enbridge waited too long to ask a …
Supreme Court has unanimously ruled in favor of Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel in her argument against Canadian company Enbridge Energy. Nessel contends Enbridge waited too long to ask a …
Sources tracked
3 outlets · 3 articles
Timeline events
2 records on file
Last updated
1 day, 23 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.