The Supreme Court is grappling with a multibillion-dollar wave of lawsuits over Roundup cancer claims. The court seems divided over whether to block thousands of lawsuits alleging the maker of the weedkiller Roundup failed to warn people it could cause cancer. The case came before the justices after a lower court allowed the lawsuits to proceed, despite the company's argument that federal law preempts state law claims. The Supreme Court's decision will have significant implications for the thousands of people who have filed lawsuits against the company.
Latest development
Media Coverage · April 27, 2026
The Supreme Court is considering a case involving thousands of lawsuits alleging that the weedkiller Roundup caused cancer. The company, Bayer, argues that it can't be sued under state law because federal regulators have found Roundup likely doesn't cause cancer. The justices seemed divided on the issue.
newspaper Read articleThe Supreme Court seemed divided Monday over whether to block thousands of lawsuits alleging the maker of the weedkiller Roundup failed to warn people it could cause cancer. The case came before the justices after a tidal wave of litigation that included some multibillion-dollar verdicts against the global agrochemical manufacturer Bayer, which owns Roundup maker Monsanto. Several justices seemed sympathetic to the company’s argument that it can’t be sued under state law because federal regulato
Open original open_in_newAttention subscribers If you are a current subscriber but do not have an online account, click here to set up your free access. If you are a current subscriber but do not have an online account, click here to set up your free access. Posted 4/27/26 The Supreme Court seems divided over whether to block thousands of lawsuits alleging the maker of the weedkiller Roundup failed to warn people it could cause cancer. The case came before the justices … This item is available in full to subscribers.
Open original open_in_newJuryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
The Supreme Court is considering a case involving thousands of lawsuits alleging that the weedkiller Roundup caused cancer. The company, Bayer, argues that it can't be sued under state law because federal regulators have found Roundup likely doesn't cause cancer. The justices seemed divided on the issue.
The Supreme Court is considering a case involving thousands of lawsuits against the maker of Roundup, a weedkiller, over claims that it caused cancer. The court is divided on whether to block the lawsuits, which could have a multibillion-dollar impact. The case is a major test of the court's willingness to limit liability for companies facing large-scale litigation.
Written by LINDSAY WHITEHURST Associated Press The Supreme Court seemed divided Monday over whether to block thousands of lawsuits alleging the maker of the weedkiller Roundup failed to warn people …
The Supreme Court seemed divided Monday over whether to block thousands of lawsuits alleging the maker of the weedkiller Roundup failed to warn people it could cause cancer. The case …
WASHINGTON – The Supreme Court seemed divided Monday over whether to block thousands of lawsuits alleging the maker of the weedkiller Roundup failed to warn people it could cause cancer. …
Attention subscribers If you are a current subscriber but do not have an online account, click here to set up your free access. If you are a current subscriber but …
Sources tracked
6 outlets · 6 articles
Timeline events
2 records on file
Last updated
4 days, 6 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.