1:25-cv-02084 ANDERSON v. EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES LLC et al
Notice of Voluntary Dismissal (aty) ( 20
The court clerk received a filing fee and partial filing fee for a new case, Francois v. Equifax Information Services, LLC, which combines with the existing case Sultanova v. Equifax Information Services, LLC et al. This filing is likely related to the ongoing litigation between the plaintiffs and Equifax. The combined filing fee is $4.
Latest development
Filing · May 8, 2026
The court clerk received a filing fee and partial filing fee for a new case, Francois v. Equifax Information Services, LLC, which combines with the existing case Sultanova v. Equifax Information Services, LLC et al. This filing is likely related to the ongoing litigation between the plaintiffs and Equifax. The combined filing fee is $4.
description View filingCourt
S.D. Fla.
Southern District of Florida · 11th Circuit · FL
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
1:25-cv-02084 ANDERSON v. EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES LLC et al
Other · May 08, 2026
Coverage
4 articles
3 sources tracked
Participants
2 Defendants, 3 Plaintiffs
6 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
This case is tied to Southern District of Florida, a federal district court in FL.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 08, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Equifax Information Services, LLC, EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES LLC, 1:25-cv-25049 Sultanova and others.
Press monitoring has found 4 related articles from 3 distinct sources.
Sultanova v. Equifax Information Services, LLC et al is an active civil matter in Southern District of Florida under docket 25-cv-25049.
The dispute currently identifies 1:25-cv-25049 Sultanova, 1:25-cv-02084 ANDERSON, and 0:26-cv-61384 Francois on one side and Equifax Information Services, LLC and EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES LLC on the other. Juryvine classifies the matter around civil litigation, settlement, federal courts, court watch.
The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.
On May 8, 2026, the docket recorded a other: A Notice of Voluntary Dismissal was filed. On May 8, 2026, the docket recorded a other: A Notice of Settlement - aty was filed. On May 8, 2026, the docket recorded a other: A Notice of Settlement was filed.
On May 8, 2026, the docket recorded a filing: The court clerk received a filing fee and partial filing fee for a new case, Francois v. Equifax Information Services, LLC, which combines with the existing case Sultanova v. Equifax Information Services, LLC et al.
This filing is likely related to the.
The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.
Clerk's Receipt (combines Filing Fee and Partial Filing Fee) ( 4
Open original open_in_newJuryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
Southern District of Florida (S.D. Fla.) is a federal district court in the 11th Circuit, FL.
A Notice of Voluntary Dismissal was filed.
A Notice of Settlement - aty was filed.
A Notice of Settlement was filed.
The court clerk received a filing fee and partial filing fee for a new case, Francois v. Equifax Information Services, LLC, which combines with the existing case Sultanova v. Equifax Information Services, LLC et al. This filing is likely related to the ongoing litigation between the plaintiffs and Equifax. The combined filing fee is $4.
Notice of Voluntary Dismissal (aty) ( 20
Notice of Settlement - aty ( 53
Notice of Settlement ( 15
Clerk's Receipt (combines Filing Fee and Partial Filing Fee) ( 4
Sources tracked
3 outlets · 4 articles
Timeline events
4 records on file
Last updated
3 hours, 53 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.