legal-news

Su v. HHUNSHA and the Individual or Entity Operating HHUNSHA

26-cv-04878
Active Court order issued Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

The court granted a temporary restraining order against HHUNSHA and the individual or entity operating it, effectively halting their activities. This order was issued in response to a complaint filed by Su, who alleged that HHUNSHA was engaging in unlawful activities. The restraining order will remain in place until a hearing can be held to determine the merits of Su's claims.

Latest development

2:26-cv-04878 GERMAN v. WARDEN et al

Order · April 30, 2026

The court issued an order.

description View filing
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.

update What Changed This Week

1 event
gavel
Order 1 day ago
The court issued an order.
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more

Emergent Immigration Habeas Non-transfer Order

Open original open_in_new

Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

2 events
gavel
Order April 30, 2026

2:26-cv-04878 GERMAN v. WARDEN et al

The court issued an order.

info
Other April 29, 2026

1:26-cv-04878 Su v. HHUNSHA and the Individual or Entity Operating HHUNSHA

The court granted a temporary restraining order against HHUNSHA and the individual or entity operating it, effectively halting their activities. This order was issued in response to a complaint filed by Su, who alleged that HHUNSHA was engaging in unlawful activities. The restraining order will remain in place until a hearing can be held to determine the merits of Su's claims.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

2 articles
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

2 outlets · 2 articles

Timeline events

2 records on file

Last updated

1 day, 13 hours ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.