Sonesta RL Hotels Franchising obtains extension of time in Massachusetts case
Case Summary
The court granted an extension of time in the case Sonesta RL Hotels Franchising Inc. v. Abus Hotels Company et al, docket number 1:26-cv-10804. This means one or more parties have more time to meet a deadline set by the court. Extensions can affect the case schedule and strategy.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Docket Snapshot
Court
D. Mass.
District of Massachusetts · 1st Circuit · MA
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
1:26-cv-10804 Sonesta RL Hotels Franchising Inc. v. Abus Hotels Company et al
Other · May 13, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
1 Defendant, 1 Plaintiff, 1 Related Organization
3 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to District of Massachusetts, a federal district court in MA.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 13, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Abus Hotels Company, 1:26-cv-10804 Sonesta RL Hotels Franchising Inc and others.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
About This Court
District of Massachusetts (D. Mass.) is a federal district court in the 1st Circuit, MA.
Case Timeline
1 event1:26-cv-10804 Sonesta RL Hotels Franchising Inc. v. Abus Hotels Company et al
The court granted an extension of time in the case Sonesta RL Hotels Franchising Inc. v. Abus Hotels Company et al, docket number 1:26-cv-10804. This means one or more parties have more time to meet a deadline set by the court. Extensions can affect the case schedule and strategy.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
27 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.