civil-litigation labor-law federal-courts court-watch

Summons Requested in SNOWBALL et al v. CLEANCHOICE ENERGY in Central District CA

26-cv-04550 C.D. Cal.
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

SNOWBALL et al v. CLEANCHOICE ENERGY, INC. is a civil case with a docket number of 26-cv-04550. The current summary of the case is that a summons has been requested, and the parties are proceeding with the case. The case is ongoing, and no further information is available at this time.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

Key Issues

  • Federal jurisdiction and procedural posture
  • Current docket activity and next procedural step
  • Labor relations and collective bargaining duties
  • Claims pleaded in the complaint and early case posture
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

C.D. Cal.

Central District of California · 9th Circuit · CA

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Active litigation

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

2:26-cv-04550 Conkrite v. Trans Union LLC

Other · Apr 29, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

2 articles

2 sources tracked

groups

Participants

2 Defendants, 2 Plaintiffs

4 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to Central District of California, a federal district court in CA.

The newest docket activity we have is a other dated April 29, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes CLEANCHOICE ENERGY, INC, Trans Union LLC, 3:26-cv-04550 SNOWBALL and others.

Press monitoring has found 2 related articles from 2 distinct sources.

chronic

The Story So Far

Updated 2 days, 10 hours ago

SNOWBALL et al v. CLEANCHOICE ENERGY, INC. is an active civil matter in Central District of California under docket 26-cv-04550.

The dispute currently identifies 2:26-cv-04550 Conkrite and 3:26-cv-04550 SNOWBALL on one side and CLEANCHOICE ENERGY, INC and Trans Union LLC on the other. The case is currently organized around Federal jurisdiction and procedural posture, Current docket activity and next procedural step, Labor relations and collective bargaining duties, Claims pleaded in the complaint and early case posture.

is a civil case with a docket number of 26-cv-04550. The current summary of the case is that a summons has been requested, and the parties are proceeding with the case. The case is ongoing, and no further information is available at this time.

On April 29, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court has been notified of a new case, Conkrite v. Trans Union LLC, with case number 2:26-cv-04550. This is a separate case from Snowball et al v. The filing of a Civil Cover Sheet indicates the start of a new lawsuit. On April 24, 2026, the docket recorded a other: A Summons was issued.

The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.

smart_toy Juryvine case narrative generated from the full docket timeline. How we verify our work.

About This Court

Central District of California (C.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

2 events
info
Other April 29, 2026

2:26-cv-04550 Conkrite v. Trans Union LLC

The court has been notified of a new case, Conkrite v. Trans Union LLC, with case number 2:26-cv-04550. This is a separate case from Snowball et al v. CleanChoice Energy, Inc. The filing of a Civil Cover Sheet indicates the start of a new lawsuit.

info
Other April 24, 2026

3:26-cv-04550 SNOWBALL et al v. CLEANCHOICE ENERGY, INC.

A Summons was issued.

Advertisement
show_chart

Coverage Timeline

newspaper

Press Coverage

2 articles
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

2 outlets · 2 articles

Timeline events

2 records on file

Last updated

5 hours, 7 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.