1:26-cv-03568 Berger v. Berger
Standing Order re Cases Filed By Pro Se Plaintiffs ( 5
Max Fagen v. David Carver et al is a civil case with a docket number of 26-cv-03568. The current summary of the case is that an answer to the complaint has been filed, and the parties are proceeding with discovery. The case is ongoing, and no further information is available at this time.
Latest development
Order · April 30, 2026
The court issued an order.
description View filingCourt
S.D.N.Y.
Southern District of New York · 2nd Circuit · NY
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Court order issued
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
1:26-cv-03568 Berger v. Berger
Order · Apr 30, 2026
Coverage
3 articles
3 sources tracked
Participants
1 Defendant, 1 Plaintiff
6 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
This case is tied to Southern District of New York, a federal district court in NY.
The newest docket activity we have is a order dated April 30, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes David Carver, 2:26-cv-03568 Max Fagen and others.
Press monitoring has found 3 related articles from 3 distinct sources.
Max Fagen v. David Carver et al is an active civil matter in Southern District of New York under docket 26-cv-03568.
The dispute currently identifies 2:26-cv-03568 Max Fagen on one side and David Carver on the other. The case is currently organized around Answer to Complaint, Ongoing Case.
David Carver et al is a civil case with a docket number of 26-cv-03568. The current summary of the case is that an answer to the complaint has been filed, and the parties are proceeding with discovery. The case is ongoing, and no further information is available at this time.
On April 30, 2026, the docket recorded a order: The court issued an order. On April 25, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court has received a Certificate of Interested Entities, Corporate Disclosure Statement, or Rule 7.1 Disclosures from Rice et al in the case of 4:26-cv-03568 v. Google LLC.
This filing is a required disclosure that outlines the parties involved in the. On April 24, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The defendant filed their Answer to the Complaint.
The next thing to watch is whether the latest order produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.
Southern District of New York (S.D.N.Y.) is a federal district court in the 2nd Circuit, NY.
The court issued an order.
The court has received a Certificate of Interested Entities, Corporate Disclosure Statement, or Rule 7.1 Disclosures from Rice et al in the case of 4:26-cv-03568 v. Google LLC. This filing is a required disclosure that outlines the parties involved in the case. The filing is significant because it provides transparency into the relationships between the parties and any potential conflicts of interest.
The defendant filed their Answer to the Complaint.
Standing Order re Cases Filed By Pro Se Plaintiffs ( 5
Certificate of Interested Entities, Corporate Disclosure Statement, or Rule 7.1 Disclosures ( 2
Answer to Complaint (Discovery) ( 9
Sources tracked
3 outlets · 3 articles
Timeline events
3 records on file
Last updated
3 hours, 40 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.