civil-litigation discovery federal-courts court-watch

Max Fagen proceeds with discovery against David Carver et al in SDNY

26-cv-03568 S.D.N.Y.
Active Court order issued Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

Max Fagen v. David Carver et al is a civil case with a docket number of 26-cv-03568. The current summary of the case is that an answer to the complaint has been filed, and the parties are proceeding with discovery. The case is ongoing, and no further information is available at this time.

Latest development

1:26-cv-03568 Berger v. Berger

Order · April 30, 2026

The court issued an order.

description View filing

Key Issues

  • Answer to Complaint
  • Discovery
  • Ongoing Case
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

S.D.N.Y.

Southern District of New York · 2nd Circuit · NY

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Court order issued

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

1:26-cv-03568 Berger v. Berger

Order · Apr 30, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

3 articles

3 sources tracked

groups

Participants

1 Defendant, 1 Plaintiff

6 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to Southern District of New York, a federal district court in NY.

The newest docket activity we have is a order dated April 30, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes David Carver, 2:26-cv-03568 Max Fagen and others.

Press monitoring has found 3 related articles from 3 distinct sources.

chronic

The Story So Far

Updated 2 days, 9 hours ago

Max Fagen v. David Carver et al is an active civil matter in Southern District of New York under docket 26-cv-03568.

The dispute currently identifies 2:26-cv-03568 Max Fagen on one side and David Carver on the other. The case is currently organized around Answer to Complaint, Ongoing Case.

David Carver et al is a civil case with a docket number of 26-cv-03568. The current summary of the case is that an answer to the complaint has been filed, and the parties are proceeding with discovery. The case is ongoing, and no further information is available at this time.

On April 30, 2026, the docket recorded a order: The court issued an order. On April 25, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court has received a Certificate of Interested Entities, Corporate Disclosure Statement, or Rule 7.1 Disclosures from Rice et al in the case of 4:26-cv-03568 v. Google LLC.

This filing is a required disclosure that outlines the parties involved in the. On April 24, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The defendant filed their Answer to the Complaint.

The next thing to watch is whether the latest order produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.

smart_toy Juryvine case narrative generated from the full docket timeline. How we verify our work.

About This Court

Southern District of New York (S.D.N.Y.) is a federal district court in the 2nd Circuit, NY.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

3 events
gavel
Order April 30, 2026

1:26-cv-03568 Berger v. Berger

The court issued an order.

info
Other April 24, 2026

4:26-cv-03568 Rice et al v. Google LLC

The court has received a Certificate of Interested Entities, Corporate Disclosure Statement, or Rule 7.1 Disclosures from Rice et al in the case of 4:26-cv-03568 v. Google LLC. This filing is a required disclosure that outlines the parties involved in the case. The filing is significant because it provides transparency into the relationships between the parties and any potential conflicts of interest.

info
Other April 24, 2026

2:26-cv-03568 Max Fagen v. David Carver et al

The defendant filed their Answer to the Complaint.

Advertisement
show_chart

Coverage Timeline

newspaper

Press Coverage

3 articles
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

3 outlets · 3 articles

Timeline events

3 records on file

Last updated

3 hours, 40 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.