appeal

Smith et al v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC

26-cv-02728
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

Smith et al v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC is a civil case with an unknown court and a docket number of 26-cv-02728. The current summary is a Notice of Record of Appeal Availability (Completion), indicating that the case may be appealed. This outcome suggests that the case has reached a critical juncture and may be subject to further review or appeal.

Latest development

7:26-cv-02728 Smith et al v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC

Appeal · April 21, 2026

A Notice of Record of Appeal Availability was filed.

description View filing

Key Issues

  • Notice of Record of Appeal Availability (Completion)
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
chronic

The Story So Far

Updated 5 days, 10 hours ago

Smith et al v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC is a civil case with an unknown court and a docket number of 26-cv-02728. The case has reached a critical juncture with the recent filing of a Notice of Record of Appeal Availability, indicating that the case may be appealed.

This development suggests that the parties involved are considering further review or appeal of the case's outcome. The Notice of Record of Appeal Availability is a key issue in the case, and its completion marks a significant milestone. The case is currently active, but the judge has not yet been assigned.

The parties involved will need to take further action to move the case forward. The next step will be for the parties to file a notice of appeal, which will initiate the appeals process. This will likely involve the filing of briefs and the potential for oral argument before a higher court.

The outcome of the appeal will depend on the specific issues raised and the arguments presented by the parties. The case will continue to be monitored for any further developments.

The recent filing of the Notice of Record of Appeal Availability is a key development in the case, and it will be important to watch for any subsequent filings or actions taken by the parties. The court's assignment of a judge to the case will also be a significant development, as it will provide clarity on the case's path forward.

The parties involved will need to take further action to move the case forward, and the next step will be for the parties to file a notice of appeal, which will initiate the appeals process.

smart_toy Juryvine case narrative generated from the full docket timeline. How we verify our work.

update What Changed This Week

1 event
arrow_upward
Appeal 6 days ago
A Notice of Record of Appeal Availability was filed.
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more

Notice of Record of Appeal Availability (Completion) ( 3

Open original open_in_new

Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

2 events
info
Other April 22, 2026

2:26-cv-02728 EASTERN ATLANTIC STATES CARPENTERS FUNDS AND THE TRUSTEES THEREOF AND EASTERN ATLANTIC STATES REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS AS SUCCESSORS TO KEYSTONE MOUNTAIN LAKES REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS v. HARDCOURTS COMMERCIAL FLOORING, INC.

The court granted a motion to intervene in the case, allowing the Eastern Atlantic States Carpenters Funds and the Trustees thereof, and the Eastern Atlantic States Regional Council of Carpenters as successors to Keystone Mountain Lakes Regional Council of Carpenters to join the lawsuit. This move gives them a seat at the table to protect their interests in the case. The court's decision allows them to participate in the litigation.

arrow_upward
Appeal April 21, 2026

7:26-cv-02728 Smith et al v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC

A Notice of Record of Appeal Availability was filed.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

2 articles
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

2 outlets · 2 articles

Timeline events

2 records on file

Last updated

5 days, 19 hours ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.