2:22-cv-03026 SHEMEN et al v. THE CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY
USCA Mandate (Terminates Appeal) ( 45
The US Court of Appeals terminated the appeal in the case of Shemen et al v. The Cincinnati Insurance Company, case number 2:22-cv-03026. This decision effectively ends the appeal process. The termination of the appeal means that the lower court's decision will stand.
Latest development
Appeal · May 4, 2026
The US Court of Appeals terminated the appeal in the case of Shemen et al v. The Cincinnati Insurance Company, case number 2:22-cv-03026. This decision effectively ends the appeal process. The termination of the appeal means that the lower court's decision will stand.
description View filingCourt
Court not identified
Awaiting court metadata
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Appeal in progress
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
2:22-cv-03026 SHEMEN et al v. THE CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY
Appeal · May 04, 2026
Coverage
1 article
1 source tracked
Participants
1 Defendant
2 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
The court metadata has not been resolved yet, so Juryvine is keeping the page conservative until a reliable court match lands.
The newest docket activity we have is a appeal dated May 04, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY and others.
Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.
USCA Mandate (Terminates Appeal) ( 45
Open original open_in_newJuryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
The US Court of Appeals terminated the appeal in the case of Shemen et al v. The Cincinnati Insurance Company, case number 2:22-cv-03026. This decision effectively ends the appeal process. The termination of the appeal means that the lower court's decision will stand.
USCA Mandate (Terminates Appeal) ( 45
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 1 article
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
3 days, 3 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.