2:25-cv-00250 Brown et al v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Stipulated Motion ( 19
The court issued a memorandum in the case of Kahn et al v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Company, which is a separate case from Schweizer et al v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company. This memorandum is a written opinion or explanation from the court. It is likely a response to a motion or request from one of the parties involved in the case.
Latest development
Motion · April 30, 2026
A Motion was filed.
description View filingStipulated Motion ( 19
Open original open_in_newJuryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
A Motion was filed.
The court issued a memorandum in the case of Kahn et al v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Company, which is a separate case from Schweizer et al v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company. This memorandum is a written opinion or explanation from the court. It is likely a response to a motion or request from one of the parties involved in the case.
Judge Sprague denied a motion in the case of Sprague et al v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, case number 1:23-cv-02523. The motion's details are not specified. This decision will impact the progress of the case.
The court denied a motion in the case of Schrader et al v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, case number 1:24-cv-02643. This decision means that the plaintiffs' request for a specific action was rejected. The court's ruling will impact the progression of the case.
The court denied the plaintiffs' motion to remand the case back to state court, allowing State Farm to continue defending the lawsuit in federal court. This decision means the case will proceed in federal court, where State Farm may have more favorable laws and procedures. The plaintiffs had argued that the case belonged in state court.
Stipulated Motion ( 19
Memorandum
Sources tracked
3 outlets · 5 articles
Timeline events
5 records on file
Last updated
3 days, 10 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.