Court schedules telephonic status conference for September 25, 2024
Case Summary
The court scheduled a telephonic status conference for September 25, 2024, requiring participation from counsel for plaintiff and defendant Hyun Kim. Other parties were excused. Defendant's counsel must be prepared to discuss statements in the parties' proposed Joint Pretrial Order concerning defendant's financial status.
Latest development
SCHEDULING ORDER: Telephonic status conference scheduled for 9/25/2024 at 10:30 a.m. before Magistrate Judge James R. Cho. Each party is directed to call 571-353-2301 and enter Meeting ID 709-478-501#. Counsel for
Order · May 11, 2026
Judge James issued an order.
Key Issues
- • Telephonic status conference
- • Mandatory counsel participation
- • Discussion of pretrial financial disclosures
Docket Snapshot
Court
Court not identified
Awaiting court metadata
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Court order issued
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
SCHEDULING ORDER: Telephonic status conference scheduled for 9/25/2024 at 10:30 a.m. before Magistrate Judge James R.
Order · May 11, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
Parties not parsed yet
1 linked entity
Judge
What the record shows
The court metadata has not been resolved yet, so Juryvine is keeping the page conservative until a reliable court match lands.
The newest docket activity we have is a order dated May 11, 2026.
Party extraction has not produced a reliable plaintiff/defendant graph yet, so no speculative names are shown.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
The Story So Far
The court set a telephonic status conference for September 25, 2024, at 10:30 a.m. before Magistrate Judge James R. Cho.
The call-in details require counsel for the plaintiff and defendant Hyun Kim to participate, while all other parties and counsel are excused. The focus will be on a statement in the parties' proposed Joint Pretrial Order 91, where defendant Hyun Kim claims to have no assets or funds to retain counsel in this case.
Judge Cho expects counsel for Hyun Kim to be ready to discuss this financial claim and whether the defendant can produce records supporting an inability to pay. This issue could affect the defendant’s ability to continue legal representation and potentially impact case management going forward.
The case remains active, but no further docket details or filings are publicly available. The court’s attention to Hyun Kim’s financial status signals a possible turning point in the litigation, especially if the defendant cannot demonstrate means to fund counsel.
The outcome of this conference may influence scheduling, discovery, or settlement discussions depending on how the financial issue is resolved.
update What Changed This Week
receipt_long Source expand_more
SCHEDULING ORDER: Telephonic status conference scheduled for 9/25/2024 at 10:30 a.m. before Magistrate Judge James R. Cho. Each party is directed to call 571-353-2301 and enter Meeting ID 709-478-501#. Counsel for plaintiff and defendant Hyun Kim shall participate in the conference. All other counsel and parties are excused from the conference. Counsel for defendant Hyun Kim shall come to the conference prepared to discuss the statement in the parties' proposed Joint Pretrial Order 91 that defen
Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
Case Timeline
1 eventSCHEDULING ORDER: Telephonic status conference scheduled for 9/25/2024 at 10:30 a.m. before Magistrate Judge James R. Cho. Each party is directed to call 571-353-2301 and enter Meeting ID 709-478-501#. Counsel for plaintiff and defendant Hyun Kim shall participate in the conference. All other counsel and parties are
Judge James issued an order.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
10 hours, 49 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.