SCHEDULING ORDER: re: 20 Joint Preliminary Report and Discovery Plan. Discovery in this case shall close on May 16, 2025. The parties shall file any motions for summary judgment no later than June 16, 2025, unless otherwise permitted by order of the Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge John K. Larkins, III on 09/18/2024. (tht) (Entered: 09/18/2024)
Case Summary
The court issued a scheduling order setting discovery to close on May 16, 2025, and motions for summary judgment due by June 16, 2025. This establishes firm deadlines for fact-finding and dispositive motions, guiding the case toward trial or settlement.
Latest development
SCHEDULING ORDER: re: 20 Joint Preliminary Report and Discovery Plan. Discovery in this case shall close on May 16, 2025. The parties shall file any motions for summary judgment no later than June 16, 2025, unless
Order · May 11, 2026
Judge John issued an order.
Key Issues
- • Discovery deadline
- • Summary judgment deadline
Docket Snapshot
Court
Court not identified
Awaiting court metadata
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Court order issued
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
SCHEDULING ORDER: re: 20 Joint Preliminary Report and Discovery Plan. Discovery in this case shall close on May 16,
Order · May 11, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
1 Presiding Judge
1 linked entity
Judge
John K. Larkins
What the record shows
The court metadata has not been resolved yet, so Juryvine is keeping the page conservative until a reliable court match lands.
The newest docket activity we have is a order dated May 11, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes John K. Larkins.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
The Story So Far
Magistrate Judge John K. Larkins, III issued a scheduling order on September 18, 2024, setting firm deadlines for discovery and dispositive motions in this case. The order requires the parties to complete discovery by May 16, 2025.
Any motions for summary judgment must be filed by June 16, 2025, unless the court grants an extension. The parties previously submitted a joint preliminary report and discovery plan, which the court used to establish these deadlines. The case remains active, but the docket and court details have not been publicly disclosed.
The scheduling order signals that the case is moving into the critical pretrial phase, focusing on fact-gathering and legal briefing. The deadlines set by Judge Larkins will shape the pace and scope of litigation going forward. The court’s control over the schedule aims to prevent delay and encourage efficient resolution.
The parties must adhere to these deadlines or seek court approval for adjustments. The next major milestones will be the close of discovery and the filing of summary judgment motions, which often determine whether the case proceeds to trial or resolves beforehand.
update What Changed This Week
receipt_long Source expand_more
SCHEDULING ORDER: re: 20 Joint Preliminary Report and Discovery Plan. Discovery in this case shall close on May 16, 2025. The parties shall file any motions for summary judgment no later than June 16, 2025, unless otherwise permitted by order of the Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge John K. Larkins, III on 09/18/2024. (tht) (Entered: 09/18/2024)
Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
Case Timeline
1 eventSCHEDULING ORDER: re: 20 Joint Preliminary Report and Discovery Plan. Discovery in this case shall close on May 16, 2025. The parties shall file any motions for summary judgment no later than June 16, 2025, unless otherwise permitted by order of the Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge John K. Larkins, III on 09/18/2024.
Judge John issued an order.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
20 hours, 39 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.