SALLEY-BEY v. JAMES et al
Case Summary
The court held a conference in the case of Goldberger et al v. James et al, which is related to the case of Salley-Bey v. James et al. This conference was likely a routine check-in to discuss the status of the case. The outcome of this conference is not specified.
Latest development
2:26-cv-04562 SALLEY-BEY v. JAMES et al
Filing · April 27, 2026
The plaintiff, Salley-Bey, has filed a notice regarding the payment of the filing fee or the submission of an in forma pauperis (IFP) application in the case of Salley-Bey v. James et al. This filing is a procedural step in the case, and it may indicate that the plaintiff is seeking to proceed with the case without paying the filing fee. The court will now consider the plaintiff's request.
description View filingupdate What Changed This Week
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more
Letter: Filing Fee or IFP due ( 3
Open original open_in_newJuryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
Case Timeline
2 events7:26-cv-02325 Goldberger et al v. James et al
The court held a conference in the case of Goldberger et al v. James et al, which is related to the case of Salley-Bey v. James et al. This conference was likely a routine check-in to discuss the status of the case. The outcome of this conference is not specified.
2:26-cv-04562 SALLEY-BEY v. JAMES et al
The plaintiff, Salley-Bey, has filed a notice regarding the payment of the filing fee or the submission of an in forma pauperis (IFP) application in the case of Salley-Bey v. James et al. This filing is a procedural step in the case, and it may indicate that the plaintiff is seeking to proceed with the case without paying the filing fee. The court will now consider the plaintiff's request.
Press Coverage
2:26-cv-04562 SALLEY-BEY v. JAMES et al
Letter: Filing Fee or IFP due ( 3
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
2 outlets · 2 articles
Timeline events
2 records on file
Last updated
1 hour, 18 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.