Midland Credit Management files Rule 7.1 disclosure statement on corporate ownership
Case Summary
RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Parent corporation, publicly held corporation owning 10 percent or more of its stock, or subsidiary reported for Midland Credit Management Inc.. (Newman, Patrick) (Entered: 05/05/2026)
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Docket Snapshot
Court
Court not identified
Awaiting court metadata
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Parent corporation, publicly held corporation owning 10 percent or more of its stock, or
Other · May 11, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
1 Related Organization
1 linked entity
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
The court metadata has not been resolved yet, so Juryvine is keeping the page conservative until a reliable court match lands.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 11, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Midland Credit Management Inc.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
Case Timeline
1 eventRULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Parent corporation, publicly held corporation owning 10 percent or more of its stock, or subsidiary reported for Midland Credit Management Inc.. (Newman, Patrick) (Entered: 05/05/2026)
Midland Credit Management Inc. filed a Rule 7.1 disclosure statement identifying its parent corporation, any publicly held corporation owning 10 percent or more of its stock, or its subsidiaries. This filing informs the court and parties about corporate relationships that could affect conflicts of interest or case management. The statement was entered by attorney Patrick Newman on May 5, 2026.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
9 hours, 17 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.