legal-news

ROYAL v. CROTHERS et al.

26-cv-04595
Active Initial filing stage Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Strike 3 Holdings, LLC, filed a copyright infringement lawsuit against an anonymous defendant, John Doe, whose IP address was identified as 108.219.212.142. This filing is an initial notification, indicating the start of the lawsuit. The plaintiff is seeking to identify and hold the defendant accountable for allegedly infringing on their copyrights.

Latest development

2:26-cv-04595 Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 108.219.212.142

Filing · April 29, 2026

The plaintiff, Strike 3 Holdings, LLC, filed a copyright infringement lawsuit against an anonymous defendant, John Doe, whose IP address was identified as 108.219.212.142. This filing is an initial notification, indicating the start of the lawsuit. The plaintiff is seeking to identify and hold the defendant accountable for allegedly infringing on their copyrights.

description View filing
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.

update What Changed This Week

1 event

Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

2 events
description
Filing April 29, 2026

2:26-cv-04595 Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 108.219.212.142

The plaintiff, Strike 3 Holdings, LLC, filed a copyright infringement lawsuit against an anonymous defendant, John Doe, whose IP address was identified as 108.219.212.142. This filing is an initial notification, indicating the start of the lawsuit. The plaintiff is seeking to identify and hold the defendant accountable for allegedly infringing on their copyrights.

info
Other April 29, 2026

2:26-cv-04595 ROYAL v. CROTHERS et al.

The court granted a petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus in the case of ROYAL v. CROTHERS et al., allowing the plaintiff to challenge the legality of their detention. This decision gives the plaintiff a chance to argue that their imprisonment is unconstitutional. The writ will be served to the defendants, who must respond to the petition.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

2 articles
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

2 outlets · 2 articles

Timeline events

2 records on file

Last updated

2 days, 16 hours ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.