Government agency Regulatory profile

Defense Office

Juryvine tracks Defense Office across litigation, regulatory sagas, source feed signals, and related entities. This page shows what is present in the record and avoids inferring penalties, liability, or enforcement outcomes unless source documents support them.

Regulatory footprint

2

linked cases

2

active

1

courts

0

sagas

Linked regulatory cases

Active Active litigation

Payne files motion to quash against DoD Inspector General in Colorado court

D. Colo. 25-mc-00068

In the District of Colorado, Payne filed a motion to quash against the Department of Defense Office of the Inspector General, docket 25-mc-00068. The court issued an order addressing the motion, which challenges the legal validity or scope of a subpoena or similar process.

1 event 1 coverage signal
Active Active litigation

Mobile PET Scan Provider to Pay $8.33 Million to Resolve False Claims Act Allegations

Court unknown

(MNI), a provider of mobile positron emission tomography (PET) scans, has agreed to pay a total of $8,334,350.71 to resolve False Claims Act allegations that it paid referring cardiologists excessive fees to supervise PET scans in violation of the Anti-Kickback Statute (AKS). This settlement is based on MNI’s ability to pay. The case highlights the

1 event 1 coverage signal

Recent docket activity

Media Coverage
The parties reported a settlement.

In Mobile PET Scan Provider to Pay $8.33 Million to Resolve False Claims Act Allegations

Order
In the case of Payne versus the Department of Defense Office of the Inspector General, the court issued an order regarding a motion to quash. This means the court made a decision on whether to reject or nullify a legal

In Payne files motion to quash against DoD Inspector General in Colorado court