(MNI), a provider of mobile positron emission tomography (PET) scans, has agreed to pay a total of $8,334,350.71 to resolve False Claims Act allegations that it paid referring cardiologists excessive fees to supervise PET scans in violation of the Anti-Kickback Statute (AKS). This settlement is based on MNI’s ability to pay. The case highlights the importance of compliance with healthcare regulations and the consequences of non-compliance.
Latest development
Media Coverage · May 1, 2026
The parties reported a settlement.
newspaper Read articleCourt
Court not identified
Awaiting court metadata
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
Mobile PET Scan Provider to Pay $8.33 Million to Resolve Allegations of False Claims Act Violations Based on Unlawful
Media Coverage · May 01, 2026
Coverage
1 article
1 source tracked
Participants
8 Government Agencys, 2 Related Organizations
10 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
The court metadata has not been resolved yet, so Juryvine is keeping the page conservative until a reliable court match lands.
The newest docket activity we have is a media coverage dated May 01, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes MNI. Modern Nuclear Inc, Modern Nuclear Inc, U.S. Department and others.
Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.
Mobile PET Scan Provider to Pay $8.33 Million to Resolve False Claims Act Allegations is an active civil matter.
Named participants include Defense Health Agency Office, Defense Office, Department of Justice, and Human Services Office. The case is currently organized around False Claims Act, Anti-Kickback Statute, healthcare regulations.
(MNI), a provider of mobile positron emission tomography (PET) scans, has agreed to pay a total of $8,334,350.71 to resolve False Claims Act allegations that it paid referring cardiologists excessive fees to supervise PET scans in violation of the Anti-Kickback Statute (AKS). This settlement is based on MNI’s ability to pay.
The case highlights the importance of compliance with healthcare regulations and the consequences of non-compliance.
On May 1, 2026, the docket recorded a media coverage: The parties reported a settlement.
The next thing to watch is whether the latest media coverage produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.
The parties reported a settlement.
(MNI), a provider of mobile positron emission tomography (PET) scans headquartered in La Habra, California, has agreed to pay a total of $8,334,350.71, plus additional amounts based on future revenues, …
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 1 article
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
5 days, 3 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.