multidistrict-litigation federal-courts court-watch

Reese et al v. Ipswitch, Inc. multidistrict litigation closed in District of Massachusetts

23-cv-11610 D. Mass.
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

The case of Reese et al v. Ipswitch, Inc. et al has been closed. The court has issued a notice indicating that the case is no longer active. This means that the case is no longer pending and no further action will be taken. The case was closed due to a lack of activity or a resolution of the dispute.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

Key Issues

  • case closed
  • lack of activity
  • resolution of dispute
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

D. Mass.

District of Massachusetts · 1st Circuit · MA

tag

Docket

Not captured

Multidistrict Litigation

timeline

Stage

Active litigation

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

1:23-cv-11610 Reese et al v. Ipswitch, Inc. et al

Other · Apr 22, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

2 articles

1 source tracked

groups

Participants

1 Defendant

3 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to District of Massachusetts, a federal district court in MA.

The newest docket activity we have is a other dated April 22, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes Ipswitch, Inc and others.

Press monitoring has found 2 related articles from 1 distinct source.

chronic

The Story So Far

Updated 3 days, 3 hours ago

Reese et al v. Ipswitch, Inc. et al is an active multidistrict litigation matter in District of Massachusetts under docket 23-cv-11610.

The main identified defendant or respondent is Ipswitch, Inc. The case is currently organized around case closed, lack of activity, resolution of dispute.

The case of Reese et al v. et al has been closed. The court has issued a notice indicating that the case is no longer active.

This means that the case is no longer pending and no further action will be taken. The case was closed due to a lack of activity or a resolution of the dispute.

On April 22, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The MDL (Multi-District Litigation) case of Reese et al v. This means that the consolidated case has been resolved, and the court has made a final decision. The closure of the MDL case brings an end to the consolidated.

On April 22, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court closed the multidistrict litigation (MDL) case 1:23-cv-11394 Pipes v. et al. This means that the consolidated case is no longer active and will be transferred back to its original jurisdiction.

The closure of the MDL case is.

The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.

smart_toy Juryvine case narrative generated from the full docket timeline. How we verify our work.

About This Court

District of Massachusetts (D. Mass.) is a federal district court in the 1st Circuit, MA.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

2 events
info
Other April 22, 2026

1:23-cv-11610 Reese et al v. Ipswitch, Inc. et al

The MDL (Multi-District Litigation) case of Reese et al v. Ipswitch, Inc. et al has been closed. This means that the consolidated case has been resolved, and the court has made a final decision. The closure of the MDL case brings an end to the consolidated litigation.

info
Other April 22, 2026

1:23-cv-11394 Pipes v. Ipswitch, Inc. et al

The court closed the multidistrict litigation (MDL) case 1:23-cv-11394 Pipes v. Ipswitch, Inc. et al. This means that the consolidated case is no longer active and will be transferred back to its original jurisdiction. The closure of the MDL case is significant because it marks the end of the centralized management of the case.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

2 articles
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

1 outlet · 2 articles

Timeline events

2 records on file

Last updated

1 day, 1 hour ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.