1:23-cv-11610 Reese et al v. Ipswitch, Inc. et al
Notice re: MDL Case Closed
The case of Reese et al v. Ipswitch, Inc. et al has been closed. The court has issued a notice indicating that the case is no longer active. This means that the case is no longer pending and no further action will be taken. The case was closed due to a lack of activity or a resolution of the dispute.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Court
D. Mass.
District of Massachusetts · 1st Circuit · MA
Docket
Not captured
Multidistrict Litigation
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
1:23-cv-11610 Reese et al v. Ipswitch, Inc. et al
Other · Apr 22, 2026
Coverage
2 articles
1 source tracked
Participants
1 Defendant
3 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
This case is tied to District of Massachusetts, a federal district court in MA.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated April 22, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Ipswitch, Inc and others.
Press monitoring has found 2 related articles from 1 distinct source.
Reese et al v. Ipswitch, Inc. et al is an active multidistrict litigation matter in District of Massachusetts under docket 23-cv-11610.
The main identified defendant or respondent is Ipswitch, Inc. The case is currently organized around case closed, lack of activity, resolution of dispute.
The case of Reese et al v. et al has been closed. The court has issued a notice indicating that the case is no longer active.
This means that the case is no longer pending and no further action will be taken. The case was closed due to a lack of activity or a resolution of the dispute.
On April 22, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The MDL (Multi-District Litigation) case of Reese et al v. This means that the consolidated case has been resolved, and the court has made a final decision. The closure of the MDL case brings an end to the consolidated.
On April 22, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court closed the multidistrict litigation (MDL) case 1:23-cv-11394 Pipes v. et al. This means that the consolidated case is no longer active and will be transferred back to its original jurisdiction.
The closure of the MDL case is.
The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.
District of Massachusetts (D. Mass.) is a federal district court in the 1st Circuit, MA.
The MDL (Multi-District Litigation) case of Reese et al v. Ipswitch, Inc. et al has been closed. This means that the consolidated case has been resolved, and the court has made a final decision. The closure of the MDL case brings an end to the consolidated litigation.
The court closed the multidistrict litigation (MDL) case 1:23-cv-11394 Pipes v. Ipswitch, Inc. et al. This means that the consolidated case is no longer active and will be transferred back to its original jurisdiction. The closure of the MDL case is significant because it marks the end of the centralized management of the case.
Notice re: MDL Case Closed
Notice re: MDL Case Closed
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 2 articles
Timeline events
2 records on file
Last updated
1 day, 1 hour ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.