newspaper
1:24-cv-10589 Roberts v. Progress Software Corporation et al
Notice of Withdrawal of Appearance ( 29
Apr 23, 2026
1 min read
multidistrict-litigation
federal-courts
court-watch
District of Massachusetts dismisses Bailey v. Progress Software Corporation et al
23-cv-12356
D. Mass.
Advertisement
description
Case Summary
Bailey v. Progress Software Corporation et al is a civil case with an unknown court. The case was dismissed with an order on the docket 23-cv-12356. The case involves a dispute between the plaintiff, Bailey, and the defendants, Progress Software Corporation and others. The reasons for the dismissal are not specified in the available information.
Stage
Active litigation
Timeline
16 events
Coverage
16 articles
Sources
1
Key Issues
- • dismissal
- • unknown court
- • dispute between plaintiff and defendants
smart_toy
Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records.
How we verify our work.
fact_check
Docket Snapshot
account_balance
Court
D. Mass.
District of Massachusetts · 1st Circuit · MA
tag
Docket
Not captured
Multidistrict Litigation
timeline
Stage
Active litigation
Active
event
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
new_releases
Latest Filing
1:24-cv-10589 Roberts v. Progress Software Corporation et al
Other · Apr 23, 2026
newspaper
Coverage
16 articles
1 source tracked
groups
Participants
1 Defendant, 6 Plaintiffs
17 linked entities
gavel
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to District of Massachusetts, a federal district court in MA.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated April 23, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Progress Software Corporation, 1:23-cv-11782 Siflinger, 1:23-cv-11442 Anastasio and others.
Press monitoring has found 16 related articles from 1 distinct source.
chronic
Updated 2 weeks, 4 days ago
The Story So Far
Bailey v. Progress Software Corporation et al is a civil case with an unknown court. The case was dismissed with an order on the docket 23-cv-12356.
The case involves a dispute between the plaintiff, Bailey, and the defendants, Progress Software Corporation and others. The reasons for the dismissal are not specified in the available information.
On April 22, 2026, the MDL case was closed, indicating that the consolidated case has been resolved, and the individual cases will be transferred to their respective courts. The next step in the case will be the transfer of the individual cases to their respective courts, where they will be assigned to a judge and a new docket number will be assigned.
The court will then schedule a status conference to discuss the next steps in the case. The plaintiff and defendants will need to file new pleadings and motions in their respective courts, and the case will proceed from there. The outcome of the case is uncertain at this time, and it will depend on the actions of the parties and the court's decisions.
smart_toy
Juryvine case narrative generated from the full docket timeline.
How we verify our work.
About This Court
District of Massachusetts (D. Mass.) is a federal district court in the 1st Circuit, MA.
Advertisement
Case Timeline
16 events
info
Other
April 23, 2026
1:24-cv-10589 Roberts v. Progress Software Corporation et al
A Notice of Withdrawal of Appearance was filed.
info
Other
April 22, 2026
1:23-cv-12356 Bailey v. Progress Software Corporation et al
The MDL (Multi-District Litigation) case of Bailey v. Progress Software Corporation et al has been closed. This means that the consolidated case has been resolved, and the individual cases will be handled separately. The closure of the MDL case is a significant development in the litigation.
info
Other
April 22, 2026
1:23-cv-12343 Berry v. Progress Software Corporation
The court closed the MDL (Multi-District Litigation) case Berry v. Progress Software Corporation. This case was consolidated with Bailey v. The closure of the MDL case indicates that the court has completed its review and processing of the consolidated cases.
info
Other
April 22, 2026
1:23-cv-11782 Siflinger et al v. Progress Software Corporation et al
The MDL (Multi-District Litigation) case Siflinger et al v. Progress Software Corporation et al has been closed. This means that the consolidated case has been resolved, and the court has issued a final decision. The closure of this case is significant for the parties involved, including Progress Software Corporation.
info
Other
April 22, 2026
1:23-cv-11777 Baker v. Progress Software Corporation
The court closed the multidistrict litigation (MDL) case 1:23-cv-11777 Baker v. Progress Software Corporation. This means that the consolidated case is no longer active, and any remaining claims will be handled individually. The closure of the MDL case does not necessarily mean the underlying lawsuits are resolved.
info
Other
April 22, 2026
1:23-cv-11669 Moore et al v. Progress Software Corporation
The court closed the multidistrict litigation (MDL) case Moore et al v. Progress Software Corporation. This means that the consolidated case is no longer active and will be transferred back to its original court. The closure of the MDL case is a procedural step that allows the court to focus on other cases.
info
Other
April 22, 2026
1:23-cv-11543 Meyer v. Progress Software Corporation
The court closed the MDL (Multi-District Litigation) case Meyer v. Progress Software Corporation. This means that the consolidated case is no longer active and will be transferred back to its original court. The closure of the MDL case does not necessarily indicate a resolution to the underlying claims.
info
Other
April 22, 2026
1:23-cv-11442 Anastasio v. Progress Software Corporation et al
The court closed the multidistrict litigation (MDL) case Anastasio v. Progress Software Corporation et al, which was consolidated with Bailey v. Progress Software Corporation et al. This means that the court has finished handling all pre-trial matters for the consolidated cases. The closure of the MDL case is a significant step towards resolving the litigation.
info
Other
April 22, 2026
1:23-cv-11417 Guillory-Caillier et al v. Progress Software Corporation
The MDL (Multi-District Litigation) case Guillory-Caillier et al v. Progress Software Corporation has been closed. This means that the consolidated case has been resolved, and the court has made a final decision. The closure of this case is significant for the parties involved, including Progress Software Corporation.
info
Other
April 22, 2026
1:23-cv-11412 Tenner v. Progress Software Corporation
The court closed the multidistrict litigation (MDL) case, 1:23-cv-11412 Tenner v. Progress Software Corporation. This means that the consolidated case is no longer active. The case was likely closed because the parties reached a settlement or the court determined that further action was not necessary.
info
Other
April 22, 2026
1:23-cv-11370 Diggs et al v. Progress Software Corporation
The MDL (Multi-District Litigation) case, Diggs et al v. Progress Software Corporation, has been closed. This means that the consolidated proceedings in the federal court system have been terminated. The notice indicates that the case is no longer active.
gavel
Order
April 22, 2026
1:23-cv-12495 Pulignani v. Progress Software Corporation et al
The court issued an order.
gavel
Order
April 22, 2026
1:23-cv-12496 Doe v. Progress Software Corporation et al
The court issued an order.
gavel
Order
April 22, 2026
1:23-cv-12497 Truesdale v. Progress Software Corporation et al
The court issued an order.
gavel
Order
April 22, 2026
1:23-cv-12440 Mosqueda v. Progress Software Corporation et al
The court issued an order.
gavel
Order
April 22, 2026
1:23-cv-12486 Harris v. Progress Software Corporation
The court issued an order.
Loading more events...
Advertisement
newspaper
16 articles
Press Coverage
newspaper
1:23-cv-12356 Bailey v. Progress Software Corporation et al
Notice re: MDL Case Closed
Apr 22, 2026
1 min read
newspaper
1:23-cv-12343 Berry v. Progress Software Corporation
Notice re: MDL Case Closed
Apr 22, 2026
1 min read
newspaper
1:23-cv-11782 Siflinger et al v. Progress Software Corporation et al
Notice re: MDL Case Closed
Apr 22, 2026
1 min read
newspaper
1:23-cv-11777 Baker v. Progress Software Corporation
Notice re: MDL Case Closed
Apr 22, 2026
1 min read
newspaper
1:23-cv-11669 Moore et al v. Progress Software Corporation
Notice re: MDL Case Closed
Apr 22, 2026
1 min read
newspaper
1:23-cv-11543 Meyer v. Progress Software Corporation
Notice re: MDL Case Closed
Apr 22, 2026
1 min read
newspaper
1:23-cv-11442 Anastasio v. Progress Software Corporation et al
Notice re: MDL Case Closed
Apr 22, 2026
1 min read
newspaper
1:23-cv-11417 Guillory-Caillier et al v. Progress Software Corporation
Notice re: MDL Case Closed
Apr 22, 2026
1 min read
newspaper
1:23-cv-11412 Tenner v. Progress Software Corporation
Notice re: MDL Case Closed
Apr 22, 2026
1 min read
newspaper
1:23-cv-11370 Diggs et al v. Progress Software Corporation
Notice re: MDL Case Closed
Apr 22, 2026
1 min read
newspaper
1:23-cv-12497 Truesdale v. Progress Software Corporation et al
Order Dismissing Case ( 23
Apr 22, 2026
1 min read
newspaper
1:23-cv-12486 Harris v. Progress Software Corporation
Order Dismissing Case ( 19
Apr 22, 2026
1 min read
newspaper
1:23-cv-12495 Pulignani v. Progress Software Corporation et al
Order Dismissing Case ( 19
Apr 22, 2026
1 min read
newspaper
1:23-cv-12496 Doe v. Progress Software Corporation et al
Order Dismissing Case ( 33
Apr 22, 2026
1 min read
newspaper
1:23-cv-12440 Mosqueda v. Progress Software Corporation et al
Order Dismissing Case ( 23
Apr 22, 2026
1 min read
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 16 articles
Timeline events
16 records on file
Last updated
10 hours, 42 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.