Ray (PS) v. Ninth Judicial District of Colorado et al

description

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Ray, filed a lawsuit against the Ninth Judicial District of Colorado and others. The court granted the plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis, allowing them to proceed with the case without paying the required filing fee. This decision was made in accordance with the court's discretion and the plaintiff's demonstrated financial need.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

Key Issues

• • proceed in forma pauperis
• • filing fee
• • financial need

smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.

Case Timeline

2 events

info

Other May 1, 2026

1:26-cv-01781 BPS Digital US, Inc. v. Deutsche Bank AG et al

The court allowed BPS Digital US, Inc. to file a Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement in the case 1:26-cv-01781. This statement discloses information about the company's corporate structure and ownership. The filing is a procedural step in the case.

description View filing open_in_new

info

Other April 27, 2026

1:26-cv-01781 Ray (PS) v. Ninth Judicial District of Colorado et al

The plaintiff, Ray, has been granted permission to proceed with their lawsuit without paying the court filing fee. This is because the court has determined that Ray is unable to pay the fee. The plaintiff's lawsuit will now move forward.

description View filing open_in_new

newspaper

Press Coverage

2 articles

All No paywall (2) Original reporting (2)

newspaper

Coverage

1:26-cv-01781 BPS Digital US, Inc. v. Deutsche Bank AG et al

Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement ( 17

May 1, 2026 · 1 min read

newspaper

Coverage

1:26-cv-01781 Ray (PS) v. Ninth Judicial District of Colorado et al

Proceed In Forma Pauperis ( 2

Apr 27, 2026 · 1 min read