legal-news

Michael D Reeves v. Department of Homeland Security DHS et al

25-cv-02452
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

Michael D Reeves filed a lawsuit against the Department of Homeland Security and others. The court granted Reeves' motion to proceed in forma pauperis, allowing him to proceed with the case without paying the required filing fee.

Latest development

1:26-cv-21717 Andrii v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al

Filing · April 24, 2026

The Department of Homeland Security and other defendants have been served with a new lawsuit, Michael D Reeves v. Department of Homeland Security DHS et al, which combines a filing fee and partial filing fee. This filing is a significant development in the case, as it marks the official start of the lawsuit. The case is now part of the 1:26-cv-21717 docket.

description View filing

Key Issues

  • proceed in forma pauperis
  • Department of Homeland Security
  • filing fee
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
Advertisement

Case Timeline

11 events
info
Other April 24, 2026

1:26-cv-10915 Mir v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al

The U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts granted an extension of time for the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and other defendants to file an answer in the case of Mir v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al (1:26-cv-10915). The extension allows the defendants an additional 5 days to respond to the complaint. This extension is significant because it gives the defendants more time to prepare their response.

info
Other April 24, 2026

1:26-cv-22874 Teruel v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al

The court granted a motion to proceed in forma pauperis in the case of Teruel v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al, allowing the plaintiff to proceed with the case without paying the required filing fee. This decision is significant because it enables the plaintiff to continue pursuing their claim despite financial constraints. The case is related to Michael D Reeves v. Department of Homeland Security DHS et al, but the two cases are distinct.

description
Filing April 24, 2026

1:26-cv-21717 Andrii v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al

The Department of Homeland Security and other defendants have been served with a new lawsuit, Michael D Reeves v. Department of Homeland Security DHS et al, which combines a filing fee and partial filing fee. This filing is a significant development in the case, as it marks the official start of the lawsuit. The case is now part of the 1:26-cv-21717 docket.

info
Other April 24, 2026

1:25-cv-13113 Armijos Hoyos et al v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al

The court granted a motion to add Michael D Reeves as a plaintiff in the case Armijos Hoyos et al v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al. This decision allows Reeves to join the existing lawsuit against the Department of Homeland Security. The addition of Reeves as a plaintiff may impact the scope and outcome of the case.

info
Other April 24, 2026

1:26-cv-22863 Cajape Farias v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al

Judge Cajape Farias has been assigned to the case 1:26-cv-22863 Cajape Farias v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al. This case is a separate matter from Michael D Reeves v. Department of Homeland Security DHS et al. The assignment of a judge to a case is a procedural step that can impact the timeline and outcome of the litigation.

info
Other April 23, 2026

2:20-cv-10911 Los Angeles Times Communications LLC v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al

The Los Angeles Times Communications LLC filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and other defendants in the case 2:20-cv-10911. The lawsuit is unrelated to the case Michael D Reeves v. Department of Homeland Security DHS et al. This filing is a separate legal action.

info
Other April 23, 2026

1:26-cv-22852 Alves v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al

The court granted the plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis, allowing them to proceed with their lawsuit without paying the required filing fee. This decision is significant because it enables the plaintiff to continue their case despite financial constraints. The plaintiff, Michael D Reeves, is suing the Department of Homeland Security and others.

info
Other April 23, 2026

5:26-cv-02062 Juan M. Rosales Gonzalez v. Department of Homeland Security et al

A Notice of Resources for ProSe Litigants was filed.

info
Other April 23, 2026

1:25-cv-03828 CAMPAIGN LEGAL CENTER et al v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al

The parties filed a joint status report.

description
Filing April 23, 2026

1:26-cv-22345 Polo Noel v. Department of Homeland Security et al

The Department of Homeland Security and other defendants in the case Michael D Reeves v. Department of Homeland Security DHS et al have been served with a new lawsuit, Polo Noel v. Department of Homeland Security et al, case number 1:26-cv-22345. The filing fee for this new case was paid by combining the full filing fee with a partial filing fee. This new lawsuit will likely be consolidated with the existing case.

info
Other April 23, 2026

8:25-cv-02452 Michael D Reeves v. Department of Homeland Security DHS et al

The US Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit issued a mandate in the case of Michael D. Reeves v. Department of Homeland Security, effectively ending the appeal process. This mandate was issued after the court's previous decision was not appealed to the US Supreme Court. The case is now closed.

Loading more events...
Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

11 articles
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

5 outlets · 11 articles

Timeline events

11 records on file

Last updated

1 week, 3 days ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.