Memorandum filed supporting motion in Ratemo v. Islamic Republic of Iran in DC
Case Summary
The case RATEMO v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al was referenced or related to the case RELVAS et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al, filed under docket number 1:14-cv-01752. This indicates a procedural or contextual link between the two cases involving the Islamic Republic of Iran. The connection may affect how the court views claims or defenses in either case.
Latest development
1:22-cv-03100 Ortiz v. Islamic Republic of Iran
Motion · May 11, 2026
A Motion was filed.
description View filingDocket Snapshot
Court
D.D.C.
District of Columbia · D.C. Circuit · DC
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
1:14-cv-01752 RELVAS et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al
Other · May 12, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
2 Defendants, 1 Plaintiff
7 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to District of Columbia, a federal district court in DC.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 12, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Islamic Republic of Iran, ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, 1:22-cv-00646 BUSHNELL and others.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
The Story So Far
RATEMO v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al, docket number 19-cv-02067 in the District of Columbia, remains active with no judge assigned yet. The case involves claims against the Islamic Republic of Iran and related parties.
The filings focus on motions seeking court orders, with three motions filed on May 11, 2026. The nature of these motions has not been publicly detailed, but their simultaneous filing suggests a coordinated effort to advance procedural or substantive issues.
The case has not disclosed its original filing date or the specific claims at issue, leaving the precise legal context unclear. The court has yet to issue rulings or assign a judge, which limits insight into how the case will proceed.
The docket activity indicates that the parties are actively engaging the court, possibly preparing for discovery or addressing jurisdictional or immunity questions. Without a judge assigned, the case remains in a preliminary posture, awaiting further administrative steps.
The involvement of a foreign sovereign defendant may complicate proceedings, as issues of sovereign immunity and service of process often arise in such cases. The court's next steps will likely clarify the scope of the claims and the procedural framework for moving forward.
update What Changed This Week
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more
Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion ( 23
Open original open_in_newreceipt_long Source (filing) expand_more
Motion For Order ( 55
Open original open_in_newreceipt_long Source (filing) expand_more
Motion For Order ( 72
Open original open_in_newreceipt_long Source (filing) expand_more
Motion For Order ( 71
Open original open_in_newJuryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
About This Court
District of Columbia (D.D.C.) is a federal district court in the D.C. Circuit, DC.
Case Timeline
5 events1:14-cv-01752 RELVAS et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al
The case RATEMO v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al was referenced or related to the case RELVAS et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al, filed under docket number 1:14-cv-01752. This indicates a procedural or contextual link between the two cases involving the Islamic Republic of Iran. The connection may affect how the court views claims or defenses in either case.
1:22-cv-03100 Ortiz v. Islamic Republic of Iran
A Motion was filed.
1:22-cv-00646 BUSHNELL et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al
A Motion was filed.
1:19-cv-02068 KATANA v. THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al
A Motion was filed.
1:19-cv-02067 RATEMO v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al
A Motion was filed.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
5 records on file
Last updated
7 hours, 42 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.