2:26-cv-05113 RODRIGUEZ LOPEZ v. MULLIN et al
Emergent Immigration Habeas Non-transfer Order
The court granted a motion to dismiss in Randolph v. Portmantos Inc., case number 1:26-cv-05113, dismissing the plaintiff's claims. This decision means the plaintiff's lawsuit against Portmantos Inc. will not proceed. The court's ruling is significant because it sets a precedent for future cases involving similar claims.
Latest development
Order · May 6, 2026
The court issued an order.
description View filingCourt
N.D. Ill.
Northern District of Illinois · 7th Circuit · IL
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Court order issued
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
2:26-cv-05113 RODRIGUEZ LOPEZ v. MULLIN et al
Order · May 06, 2026
Coverage
2 articles
2 sources tracked
Participants
1 Defendant, 2 Plaintiffs
4 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
This case is tied to Northern District of Illinois, a federal district court in IL.
The newest docket activity we have is a order dated May 06, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Portmantos Inc, 1:26-cv-05113 Randolph, 2:26-cv-05113 RODRIGUEZ LOPEZ and others.
Press monitoring has found 2 related articles from 2 distinct sources.
Emergent Immigration Habeas Non-transfer Order
Open original open_in_newJuryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
Northern District of Illinois (N.D. Ill.) is a federal district court in the 7th Circuit, IL.
The court issued an order.
The court granted a motion to dismiss in Randolph v. Portmantos Inc., case number 1:26-cv-05113, dismissing the plaintiff's claims. This decision means the plaintiff's lawsuit against Portmantos Inc. will not proceed. The court's ruling is significant because it sets a precedent for future cases involving similar claims.
Emergent Immigration Habeas Non-transfer Order
Sources tracked
2 outlets · 2 articles
Timeline events
2 records on file
Last updated
15 hours, 9 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.