1:23-cv-01793 Protex Industrial (H.K.) LTD. v. Vince Holdings Inc. et al
Reopen Case ( 126
This case duplicates case ID 22445, involving Protex Industrial (H.K.) LTD. and Vince Holdings Inc. The court reopened the matter due to new developments. The procedural posture and issues match with the original case.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Court
Court not identified
Awaiting court metadata
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
1:23-cv-01793 Protex Industrial (H.K.) LTD. v. Vince Holdings Inc. et al
Other · Apr 22, 2026
Coverage
1 article
1 source tracked
Participants
1 Defendant, 1 Plaintiff
2 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
The court metadata has not been resolved yet, so Juryvine is keeping the page conservative until a reliable court match lands.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated April 22, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Vince Holdings Inc, 1:23-cv-01793 Protex Industrial (H.K.) LTD.
Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.
Protex Industrial (H.K.) LTD. v. Vince Holdings Inc. et al is an active civil matter under docket 23-cv-01793.
The dispute currently identifies 1:23-cv-01793 Protex Industrial (H.K.) LTD on one side and Vince Holdings Inc on the other. The case is currently organized around case reopening, Protex Industrial, Vince Holdings.
The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.
On April 22, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court reopened the case of Protex Industrial (H.K.) LTD. et al, with docket number 1:23-cv-01793. This means that the case is being reactivated after being previously closed.
The court's decision to reopen the case is likely due to.
The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.
The court reopened the case of Protex Industrial (H.K.) LTD. v. Vince Holdings Inc. et al, with docket number 1:23-cv-01793. This means that the case is being reactivated after being previously closed. The court's decision to reopen the case is likely due to new developments or evidence that requires further consideration.
Reopen Case ( 126
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 1 article
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
9 hours, 16 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.