1:23-cv-01793 Protex Industrial (H.K.) LTD. v. Vince Holdings Inc. et al
Reopen Case ( 126
The court reopened the previously closed case between Protex Industrial (H.K.) LTD. and Vince Holdings Inc. under docket 23-cv-01793. The reopening suggests new facts or legal issues have emerged requiring judicial reconsideration.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Court
Court not identified
Awaiting court metadata
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
1:23-cv-01793 Protex Industrial (H.K.) LTD. v. Vince Holdings Inc. et al
Other · Apr 22, 2026
Coverage
1 article
1 source tracked
Participants
1 Defendant, 1 Plaintiff
2 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
The court metadata has not been resolved yet, so Juryvine is keeping the page conservative until a reliable court match lands.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated April 22, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Vince Holdings Inc, 1:23-cv-01793 Protex Industrial (H.K.) LTD.
Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.
Protex Industrial (H.K.) LTD. v. Vince Holdings Inc. et al is an active civil matter under docket 23-cv-01793.
The dispute currently identifies 1:23-cv-01793 Protex Industrial (H.K.) LTD on one side and Vince Holdings Inc on the other. The case is currently organized around case reopening, Protex Industrial, Vince Holdings.
The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.
On April 22, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court reopened the case of Protex Industrial (H.K.) LTD. et al, with docket number 1:23-cv-01793. This action allows the case to proceed after being previously closed.
The reopening of the case is significant because it indicates.
The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.
The court reopened the case of Protex Industrial (H.K.) LTD. v. Vince Holdings Inc. et al, with docket number 1:23-cv-01793. This action allows the case to proceed after being previously closed. The reopening of the case is significant because it indicates that the parties have taken steps to resolve the issues that led to the case being closed.
Reopen Case ( 126
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 1 article
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
6 hours, 35 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.