Planet Aid files proof of service for reply in support of summary judgment
Case Summary
Planet Aid filed proof of service for its reply brief supporting the motion for summary judgment on July 10, 2015. This filing completes briefing on the dispositive motion.
Latest development
PROOF OF SERVICE by plaintiff Planet Aid Reply in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment (Dalton, Daniel) (Entered: 07/10/2015)
Motion · May 11, 2026
A Motion was filed.
Key Issues
- • Summary judgment reply
- • Proof of service
- • Motion practice
Docket Snapshot
Court
Court not identified
Awaiting court metadata
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Motion practice
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
PROOF OF SERVICE by plaintiff Planet Aid Reply in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment (Dalton, Daniel) (Entered:
Motion · May 12, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
Parties not parsed yet
0 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
The court metadata has not been resolved yet, so Juryvine is keeping the page conservative until a reliable court match lands.
The newest docket activity we have is a motion dated May 12, 2026.
Party extraction has not produced a reliable plaintiff/defendant graph yet, so no speculative names are shown.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
update What Changed This Week
receipt_long Source expand_more
PROOF OF SERVICE by plaintiff Planet Aid Reply in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment (Dalton, Daniel) (Entered: 07/10/2015)
Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
Case Timeline
1 eventPROOF OF SERVICE by plaintiff Planet Aid Reply in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment (Dalton, Daniel) (Entered: 07/10/2015)
A Motion was filed.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
5 hours, 43 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.