Defendant objects to Intertainment's pretrial conference order portion
Case Summary
The defendant filed proof of service on November 4, 2002, submitting objections to Intertainment Licensing GMBH's portion of the pretrial conference order in case number SA CV 01-1025. This filing indicated disagreement with the plaintiff's proposed pretrial procedures or rulings.
Latest development
PROOF OF SERVICE by defendant on 11/4/02 of objections to Intertainment Licensing GMBH's portion of pretrial conference order in case number SA CV 01-1025 (pj) (Entered: 11/18/2002)
Order · May 10, 2026
The court issued an order.
Key Issues
- • Proof of service
- • Objections to pretrial order
- • Case number SA CV 01-1025
Docket Snapshot
Court
Court not identified
Awaiting court metadata
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Court order issued
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
PROOF OF SERVICE by defendant on 11/4/02 of objections to Intertainment Licensing GMBH's portion of pretrial conference
Order · May 10, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
Parties not parsed yet
0 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
The court metadata has not been resolved yet, so Juryvine is keeping the page conservative until a reliable court match lands.
The newest docket activity we have is a order dated May 10, 2026.
Party extraction has not produced a reliable plaintiff/defendant graph yet, so no speculative names are shown.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
The Story So Far
The defendant filed a proof of service on November 4, 2002, confirming delivery of objections to Intertainment Licensing GMBH's section of the pretrial conference order in case number SA CV 01-1025 (pj). The objections challenge aspects of the pretrial order that govern the scope and procedures for the upcoming trial.
The case remains active, but no judge has been assigned yet, leaving the timing of any ruling on these objections uncertain. The court docket does not provide additional details on the nature of the objections or the underlying dispute between the parties.
The pretrial conference order typically sets deadlines and parameters for discovery, motions, and trial preparation, so these objections could affect the case's schedule and strategy. The next significant step will be the court's response to the defendant's objections, which could clarify or modify the pretrial procedures.
The lack of a judge assignment suggests the case is still in early stages or awaiting administrative action. Monitoring docket updates for judge assignment and rulings on these objections will be critical to understanding how the case will proceed.
update What Changed This Week
receipt_long Source expand_more
PROOF OF SERVICE by defendant on 11/4/02 of objections to Intertainment Licensing GMBH's portion of pretrial conference order in case number SA CV 01-1025 (pj) (Entered: 11/18/2002)
Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
Case Timeline
1 eventPROOF OF SERVICE by defendant on 11/4/02 of objections to Intertainment Licensing GMBH's portion of pretrial conference order in case number SA CV 01-1025 (pj) (Entered: 11/18/2002)
The court issued an order.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
1 day, 12 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.