1:25-cv-01915 Principal National Life Insurance Company v. Hannaway et al
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File ( 26
Principal National Life Insurance Company filed suit against Hannaway and other defendants, docket 25-cv-01915. The court granted an extension of time to file, suggesting one party needed additional time to respond to a pleading or meet a deadline. Insurance company plaintiffs in civil actions of this type often pursue claims involving policy rescission, fraud in the application, or interpleader disputes over competing beneficiary claims. The extension order alone does not reveal which theory Principal is pursuing.
Latest development
Order · April 20, 2026
A Motion was filed.
description View filingPrincipal National Life Insurance Company filed a federal interpleader action against defendants identified as Hannaway et al., docketed as 25-cv-01915.
The case appears to involve a disputed life insurance benefit — the classic interpleader setup where the insurer holds funds it cannot safely pay out because competing claimants each assert a right to the money. Principal National filed suit to deposit the contested proceeds with the court and let the claimants fight it out among themselves.
No judge has been assigned as of the most recent docket entries. The case was filed in 2025, and the docket number places it in federal court, though the specific district has not been confirmed in available records.
The most recent docket activity is an April 20, 2026 order on a motion for extension of time to file. That kind of motion typically signals that a party needs more time to answer, respond to a motion, or submit a required filing. The court granted or addressed the motion — the record does not specify the outcome — but the case remains active.
In a standard interpleader, once the insurer deposits the funds and is discharged from the action, the litigation shifts entirely to the competing claimants. The central question becomes who among the named defendants has the superior legal claim to the benefit.
That fight can turn on beneficiary designations, allegations of fraud or undue influence, divorce decrees, or competing assignments — none of which are confirmed on this docket yet.
The sparse record here — no assigned judge, no confirmed district, minimal docket entries — suggests the case is still in its early procedural stages. The extension motion may reflect a defendant who has not yet formally appeared or a claimant still assembling their position.
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File ( 26
Open original open_in_newJuryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
A Motion was filed.
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File ( 26
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 1 article
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
1 hour, 13 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.