newspaper
legal-news
PITTMAN v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
24-cv-00170
Advertisement
description
Case Summary
The case of PITTMAN v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al is a civil case with a sentencing memorandum filed. The case was filed in the district court with docket number 24-cv-00170.
Latest development
4:21-cr-00251-1 USA v. Pittman
Verdict · April 21, 2026
Sentencing Memorandum ( 63
description View filingKey Issues
- • sentencing memorandum
- • district court
smart_toy
Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records.
How we verify our work.
update What Changed This Week
2 events
verified
Verdict
5 hours ago
A verdict was reached. -1 USA v. Pittman
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more
Sentencing Memorandum ( 63
Open original open_in_new
verified
Verdict
5 hours ago
A verdict was reached. -1 USA v. Pittman
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more
Sentencing Memorandum ( 45
Open original open_in_newJuryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
Advertisement
Case Timeline
3 events
verified
Verdict
April 21, 2026
4:21-cr-00251-1 USA v. Pittman
Sentencing Memorandum ( 63
verified
Verdict
April 21, 2026
4:24-cr-00592-1 USA v. Pittman
Sentencing Memorandum ( 45
info
Other
April 21, 2026
2:24-cv-00170 PITTMAN v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
The court returned mail to the plaintiff in the case of PITTMAN v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al, indicating that the court was unable to deliver the mail to the intended recipient. This is likely due to an issue with the address or the recipient's status. The returned mail may be a routine matter, but it could also indicate a problem with the court's communication with the parties involved.
Advertisement
newspaper
3 articles
Press Coverage
newspaper
newspaper
2:24-cv-00170 PITTMAN v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
Mail Returned ( 6
Apr 21, 2026
1 min read
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
2 outlets · 3 articles
Timeline events
3 records on file
Last updated
24 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.