legal-news

Pirc v. Upgrade, Inc. et al

26-cv-02521
Active Court order issued Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

This entry duplicates case 16376 — Pirc v. Upgrade, Inc. et al, docket 26-cv-02521 — and reflects the same stipulation filing at docket entry 19. No additional facts distinguish this record from case 16376. As with the Jean et al duplication, this entry may track a separate party or proceeding within the same docket. The underlying civil action against Upgrade, Inc. and co-defendants remains the operative matter.

Latest development

5:26-cv-02521 Pirc v. Upgrade, Inc. et al

Order · April 20, 2026

The court issued an order.

description View filing

Key Issues

  • Relationship between case entries 16376 and 16377
  • Whether separate parties are tracked under each entry
  • Content and effect of the stipulation at entry 19
  • Status of claims against all named defendants
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
chronic

The Story So Far

Updated 2 hours, 3 minutes ago

A stipulation without a proposed order is the only public record so far in Pirc v. Upgrade, Inc. et al, docket 26-cv-02521.

The court issued an order on April 20, 2026 — the case's sole docketed event to date. No judge has been assigned, the filing date is not yet confirmed in available records, and the court of record has not been identified in the materials provided.

The case name puts an individual plaintiff, Pirc, against Upgrade, Inc. and at least one other defendant. is a consumer fintech company that offers personal loans and credit products.

That context suggests the dispute may involve lending practices, credit reporting, or consumer protection claims — but nothing on the current docket confirms the theory of liability.

A stipulation without a proposed order typically means the parties agreed to something procedural — an extension, a briefing schedule, a discovery deadline — but did not submit a draft order for the judge to sign. The court then issued its own order in response. Without the underlying stipulation text or the order's content, the practical effect of that exchange is unknown.

The absence of a judge assignment and the thin docket suggest this case is in its earliest stage. Service may not yet be complete, or the parties may still be working through initial scheduling. Until a judge is assigned and an initial case management order issues, the litigation has no formal track.

smart_toy Juryvine case narrative generated from the full docket timeline. How we verify our work.

update What Changed This Week

1 event
gavel
Order 2 hours ago
The court issued an order.
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more

Stipulation without Proposed Order ( 19

Open original open_in_new

Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

1 event
gavel
Order April 20, 2026

5:26-cv-02521 Pirc v. Upgrade, Inc. et al

The court issued an order.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

1 article
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

1 outlet · 1 article

Timeline events

1 record on file

Last updated

1 hour, 18 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.