PAO Tatneft moves to terminate motions against Winston & Strawn LLP in Southern District of New York
Case Summary
PAO Tatneft filed a motion to terminate motions against Winston & Strawn LLP. The case is in the Southern District of New York with docket number 26-mc-00076. This filing indicates a procedural dispute involving prior motions. PAO Tatneft seeks to end certain pending motions. The nature of these motions and the underlying dispute are not detailed. The court will consider the motion to terminate.
Latest development
1:22-mc-00036 Ukraine v. PAO Tatneft
Motion · April 23, 2026
The court granted a motion to terminate motions in the case of Ukraine v. PAO Tatneft, effectively ending the dispute. This decision was made in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York (SDNY). The motion was filed as part of the ongoing litigation.
description View filingKey Issues
- • Motion Practice
- • Legal Malpractice
- • Discovery Dispute
Docket Snapshot
Court
S.D.N.Y.
Southern District of New York · 2nd Circuit · NY
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Motion practice
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
1:22-mc-00036 Ukraine v. PAO Tatneft
Motion · Apr 23, 2026
Coverage
2 articles
1 source tracked
Participants
2 Defendants, 1 Plaintiff
3 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to Southern District of New York, a federal district court in NY.
The newest docket activity we have is a motion dated April 23, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Winston & Strawn LLP, PAO Tatneft and others.
Press monitoring has found 2 related articles from 1 distinct source.
The Story So Far
PAO Tatneft v. Winston & Strawn LLP is an active civil matter in Southern District of New York under docket 26-mc-00076.
The dispute currently identifies 1:26-mc-00076 PAO Tatneft on one side and PAO Tatneft and Winston & Strawn LLP on the other. The case is currently organized around Terminate Motions, PAO Tatneft, Winston & Strawn LLP.
The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.
On April 23, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court granted a motion to seal a document in the case PAO Tatneft v. Winston & Strawn LLP. This means that the document will be kept confidential and not publicly available.
The court's decision allows the parties to protect sensitive information. On April 23, 2026, the docket recorded a motion: The court granted a motion to terminate motions in the case of Ukraine v. PAO Tatneft, effectively ending the dispute.
This decision was made in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York (SDNY). The motion was filed as part of the ongoing.
The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.
About This Court
Southern District of New York (S.D.N.Y.) is a federal district court in the 2nd Circuit, NY.
Case Timeline
2 events1:22-mc-00036 Ukraine v. PAO Tatneft
The court granted a motion to terminate motions in the case of Ukraine v. PAO Tatneft, effectively ending the dispute. This decision was made in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York (SDNY). The motion was filed as part of the ongoing litigation.
1:26-mc-00076 PAO Tatneft v. Winston & Strawn LLP
The court granted a motion to seal a document in the case PAO Tatneft v. Winston & Strawn LLP. This means that the document will be kept confidential and not publicly available. The court's decision allows the parties to protect sensitive information.
Press Coverage
1:22-mc-00036 Ukraine v. PAO Tatneft
~Util - Terminate Motions ( 116
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 2 articles
Timeline events
2 records on file
Last updated
2 days, 22 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.