legal-news

BIANCHI v. PATEL

26-cv-02760
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

The case of BIANCHI v. PATEL is a civil lawsuit with a docket number of 26-cv-02760. The current summary of the case is an Amended Complaint. The court has not been specified.

Latest development

1:23-cr-00543-1 USA v. PATEL

Motion · April 23, 2026

The court terminated all motions in the case USA v. Patel (1:23-cr-00543-1). This means that the parties involved can no longer file new motions or amend existing ones. The termination of motions is a procedural step that allows the case to move forward.

description View filing

Key Issues

  • Amended Complaint
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.

update What Changed This Week

1 event

Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

3 events
info
Other April 23, 2026

3:26-cv-02760 McGinity v. Reimagined Parking LLC, d/b/a Imperial Parking (U.S.), LLC

An Amended Complaint was filed.

edit_note
Motion April 23, 2026

1:23-cr-00543-1 USA v. PATEL

The court terminated all motions in the case USA v. Patel (1:23-cr-00543-1). This means that the parties involved can no longer file new motions or amend existing ones. The termination of motions is a procedural step that allows the case to move forward.

info
Other April 23, 2026

2:26-cv-02760 BIANCHI v. PATEL

The plaintiff, Bianchi, has waived service of process in the case against defendant Patel. This means that Patel will not be required to appear in court to acknowledge receipt of the lawsuit. The waiver allows the case to proceed without Patel's formal response.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

3 articles
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

3 outlets · 3 articles

Timeline events

3 records on file

Last updated

16 hours, 7 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.