3:19-cv-21505 PAGLIAROLI v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief
The court processed a payment of fees for the case Lurch v. New York City Department of Corrections et al, which is a separate case from Paloma v. New York City Department of Corrections et al. This payment is likely related to the costs associated with the Lurch case. The payment was processed on an unspecified date.
Latest development
Order · May 6, 2026
A Motion for Miscellaneous Relief was filed.
description View filingCourt
D.N.J.
District of New Jersey · 3rd Circuit · NJ
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Court order issued
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
3:19-cv-21505 PAGLIAROLI v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
Order · May 06, 2026
Coverage
3 articles
2 sources tracked
Participants
2 Defendants, 1 Government Agency, 1 Plaintiff
6 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
This case is tied to District of New Jersey, a federal district court in NJ.
The newest docket activity we have is a order dated May 06, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes New York City Department of Corrections, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, 3:19-cv-21505 PAGLIAROLI and others.
Press monitoring has found 3 related articles from 2 distinct sources.
Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief
Open original open_in_newJuryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
District of New Jersey (D.N.J.) is a federal district court in the 3rd Circuit, NJ.
A Motion for Miscellaneous Relief was filed.
The court processed a payment of fees for the case Lurch v. New York City Department of Corrections et al, which is a separate case from Paloma v. New York City Department of Corrections et al. This payment is likely related to the costs associated with the Lurch case. The payment was processed on an unspecified date.
The court processed a payment of fees for the Paloma v. New York City Department of Corrections et al case, which is a pro se case meaning it is being handled by the plaintiff without an attorney. This payment is likely related to court costs or filing fees associated with the case. The payment of fees is a routine administrative task.
Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief
Pro Se Payment of Fee - Processed
Pro Se Payment of Fee - Processed
Sources tracked
2 outlets · 3 articles
Timeline events
3 records on file
Last updated
20 hours, 28 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.