civil-litigation federal-courts court-watch

Judge Reassigns Overturf v. Trujillo Case

26-cv-00795 D. Colo.
Active Court order issued Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

The case of Overturf v. Trujillo has been reassigned to a new judge. The order reassigning the case was filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado. The reason for the reassignment was not specified in the order.

Latest development

1:26-cv-00795 MOON v. ROLLINS

Order · May 11, 2026

The court issued an order.

description View filing

Key Issues

  • judge reassignment
  • court administration
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

D. Colo.

District of Colorado · 10th Circuit · CO

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Court order issued

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

1:26-cv-00795 MOON v. ROLLINS

Order · May 11, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

1 article

1 source tracked

groups

Participants

1 Plaintiff

3 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to District of Colorado, a federal district court in CO.

The newest docket activity we have is a order dated May 11, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes Overturf (PS) and others.

Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.

chronic

The Story So Far

Updated 1 day, 16 hours ago

The case Overturf v. Trujillo, docket number 26-cv-00795, is active in the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado.

The court issued an order reassigning the case to a new judge. The order did not provide a reason for the reassignment. The case remains without a named judge as of the latest filings.

The reassignment order was filed on May 11, 2026, following a prior court order on April 23, 2026. Both orders are procedural and do not address the merits of the dispute between Overturf and Trujillo. The docket shows no substantive motions or rulings beyond these administrative steps.

Judge reassignments often occur due to workload balancing, conflicts of interest, or administrative considerations. The absence of an explanation in the order leaves the cause unclear. The reassignment resets the case’s management under the new judge’s oversight.

No scheduling orders or substantive filings have followed the reassignment. The parties have not yet clarified their positions through motions or pleadings since the case transferred. The court has not set deadlines or hearings tied to the reassignment.

The case’s future trajectory depends on the newly assigned judge’s initial rulings. The judge will likely issue a scheduling order or address pending procedural matters. The parties may file motions to shape the case’s direction once the judge takes control.

Watch for the first substantive order from the new judge. That order will signal how the court plans to manage the case going forward and whether it will move quickly or stall in early stages.

smart_toy Juryvine case narrative generated from the full docket timeline. How we verify our work.

update What Changed This Week

1 event
gavel
Order 1 day ago
The court issued an order.
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more

Order Dismissing Pro Se Case ( 4

Open original open_in_new

Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.

About This Court

District of Colorado (D. Colo.) is a federal district court in the 10th Circuit, CO.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

2 events
gavel
Order May 11, 2026

1:26-cv-00795 MOON v. ROLLINS

The court issued an order.

gavel
Order April 23, 2026

1:26-cv-00795 Overturf (PS) v. Trujillo et al

The court issued an order.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

1 article
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

1 outlet · 1 article

Timeline events

2 records on file

Last updated

4 days, 20 hours ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.