civil-litigation settlement court-watch

ORDER: The telephonic status conference previously scheduled for 5/28/2025 is canceled in light of Dkt. 36 Stipulation of Dismissal. Ordered by Magistrate Judge James R. Cho on 5/21/2025. (SGC)

Active Court order issued Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

Magistrate Judge James R. Cho canceled a telephonic status conference scheduled for May 28, 2025. The cancellation followed a stipulation of dismissal filed in docket 36, signaling case resolution.

Latest development

ORDER: The telephonic status conference previously scheduled for 5/28/2025 is canceled in light of Dkt. 36 Stipulation of Dismissal. Ordered by Magistrate Judge James R. Cho on 5/21/2025. (SGC)

Order · May 11, 2026

Judge James issued an order.

Key Issues

  • Status conference cancellation
  • Stipulation of dismissal
  • Case resolution
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

Court not identified

Awaiting court metadata

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Court order issued

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

ORDER: The telephonic status conference previously scheduled for 5/28/2025 is canceled in light of Dkt. 36 Stipulation

Order · May 11, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

0 articles

0 sources tracked

groups

Participants

Parties not parsed yet

1 linked entity

gavel

Judge

What the record shows

The court metadata has not been resolved yet, so Juryvine is keeping the page conservative until a reliable court match lands.

The newest docket activity we have is a order dated May 11, 2026.

Party extraction has not produced a reliable plaintiff/defendant graph yet, so no speculative names are shown.

No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.

chronic

The Story So Far

Updated 5 hours, 39 minutes ago

Magistrate Judge James R. Cho canceled the telephonic status conference set for May 28, 2025. The cancellation followed the filing of a stipulation of dismissal at docket entry 36.

The stipulation indicates that the parties agreed to end the case voluntarily. The court has not provided details on the terms of the dismissal or whether it is with or without prejudice. The case remains active on the docket, but the dismissal suggests no further proceedings are expected unless the dismissal is later withdrawn or challenged.

The case lacks publicly available information on the parties involved, the underlying claims, or the court where it is pending. The absence of a scheduled status conference and the dismissal filing mark a significant procedural development, effectively pausing or ending litigation activity for now.

The next docket activity will likely confirm whether the dismissal fully resolves the dispute or if any residual issues remain for the court to address.

smart_toy Juryvine case narrative generated from the full docket timeline. How we verify our work.

update What Changed This Week

1 event
gavel
Order 6 hours ago
Judge James issued an order.
receipt_long Source expand_more

ORDER: The telephonic status conference previously scheduled for 5/28/2025 is canceled in light of Dkt. 36 Stipulation of Dismissal. Ordered by Magistrate Judge James R. Cho on 5/21/2025. (SGC)

Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

1 event
gavel
Order May 11, 2026

ORDER: The telephonic status conference previously scheduled for 5/28/2025 is canceled in light of Dkt. 36 Stipulation of Dismissal. Ordered by Magistrate Judge James R. Cho on 5/21/2025. (SGC)

Judge James issued an order.

Advertisement
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

0 outlets · 0 articles

Timeline events

1 record on file

Last updated

1 hour, 20 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.