Magistrate Judge Vaala approves joint discovery plan and cancels pretrial conference
Case Summary
Magistrate Judge Lindsey R. Vaala approved the parties' joint discovery plan with amendments. The court canceled the initial pretrial conference scheduled for February 18, 2026, based on the parties' request and the approved plan.
Latest development
Order Rule 16(b) Scheduling Order - Pursuant to the Rule 16(b) Conference it is ordered that the Joint Discovery Plan filed by the parties is approved, as amended herein, and shall control discovery to the extent of its
Order · May 12, 2026
An Amended herein was filed.
Key Issues
- • Discovery plan approval
- • Pretrial conference cancellation
- • Rule 16(b) scheduling
Docket Snapshot
Court
Court not identified
Awaiting court metadata
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Court order issued
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
Order Rule 16(b) Scheduling Order - Pursuant to the Rule 16(b) Conference it is ordered that the Joint Discovery Plan
Order · May 12, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
1 Presiding Judge
1 linked entity
Judge
Lindsey R. Vaala
What the record shows
The court metadata has not been resolved yet, so Juryvine is keeping the page conservative until a reliable court match lands.
The newest docket activity we have is a order dated May 12, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Lindsey R. Vaala.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
The Story So Far
Magistrate Judge Lindsey R. Vaala approved the parties' Joint Discovery Plan with amendments on February 13, 2026. The plan will govern discovery unless the court modifies it later.
The initial pretrial conference set for February 18, 2026, was cancelled at the parties' request. This order follows a Rule 16(b) scheduling conference, which sets the framework for discovery and case management.
The court’s approval signals that the parties have agreed on a discovery schedule and procedures, reducing the likelihood of disputes over timing and scope. The docket does not specify the underlying claims or parties involved. The case remains active, with discovery now proceeding under the approved plan.
The court’s order reflects standard practice in federal litigation to streamline pretrial preparation. The cancellation of the pretrial conference suggests the parties want to focus on discovery before addressing other pretrial matters. The docket shows an amendment filed on May 12, 2026, indicating ongoing adjustments to the discovery plan or case schedule.
The next significant developments will likely involve motions related to discovery disputes or a new scheduling order if the parties seek further changes.
update What Changed This Week
receipt_long Source expand_more
Order Rule 16(b) Scheduling Order - Pursuant to the Rule 16(b) Conference it is ordered that the Joint Discovery Plan filed by the parties is approved, as amended herein, and shall control discovery to the extent of its application unless further modified by the Court. Upon review of the Joint Discovery Plan and at the request of the parties, the initial pretrial conference scheduled for February 18, 2026 is cancelled (see Order for further details). Signed by Magistrate Judge Lindsey R. Vaala o
Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
Case Timeline
1 eventOrder Rule 16(b) Scheduling Order - Pursuant to the Rule 16(b) Conference it is ordered that the Joint Discovery Plan filed by the parties is approved, as amended herein, and shall control discovery to the extent of its application unless further modified by the Court. Upon review of the Joint Discovery Plan and at
An Amended herein was filed.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
14 hours, 9 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.