ORDER re: 73 . The parties are directed to file a letter by 11/17/2023 attaching redacted versions of the relevant exhibits to 68, clearly indicating which attachment to 68 each document should replace (e.g., Exhibit 2 should replace 68-3 , Exhibit 5 should replace 68-6 , etc.). Once the parties have filed that letter, the Clerk of Court is directed to replace the sealed attachments to 68 with the appropriate redacted versions. The Clerk of Court shall also terminate 68, which plaintiff has

The court ordered the parties to submit a letter by November 17, 2023, attaching redacted versions of certain exhibits originally filed under seal as part of docket entry 68. The letter must specify which redacted exhibit corresponds to each sealed attachment, such as Exhibit 2 replacing attachment 68-3 and Exhibit 5 replacing 68-6.

After receiving the letter, the Clerk of Court will replace the sealed exhibits in docket 68 with the redacted versions. The court also directed the Clerk to terminate docket entry 68, which the plaintiff withdrew, along with docket entry 70, which related to 68. Judge Brian M.

Cogan issued this order on November 15, 2023. This procedural step aims to remove sealed documents from the public record while preserving necessary information in redacted form. The case remains active, but the recent order reflects a narrowing of the issues before the court by withdrawing certain filings and replacing sealed exhibits with redacted ones.