Judge Donnelly grants adjournment, resets injunction hearing to April 29, 2026
Case Summary
Judge Ann M. Donnelly granted a motion to adjourn the conference related to the preliminary injunction. The hearing was reset to April 29, 2026, at 11:00 a.m. in Courtroom 4G North.
Latest development
ORDER granting 25 Motion to Adjourn Conference. The hearing on the motion for preliminary injunction is reset to April 29, 2026 at 11:00 a.m. in Courtroom 4G North. Ordered by Judge Ann M. Donnelly on 4/21/2026. (CES)
Order · May 11, 2026
Judge Ann granted Motion to Adjourn Conference.
Key Issues
- • Motion to adjourn
- • Preliminary injunction hearing
- • Scheduling
Docket Snapshot
Court
Court not identified
Awaiting court metadata
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Court order issued
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
ORDER granting 25 Motion to Adjourn Conference. The hearing on the motion for preliminary injunction is reset to April
Order · May 11, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
1 Presiding Judge
1 linked entity
Judge
Ann M. Donnelly
What the record shows
The court metadata has not been resolved yet, so Juryvine is keeping the page conservative until a reliable court match lands.
The newest docket activity we have is a order dated May 11, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Ann M. Donnelly.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
The Story So Far
The court scheduled a new date for the hearing on the motion for preliminary injunction, moving it to April 29, 2026, at 11:00 a.m. in Courtroom 4G North. This change came after Judge Ann M.
Donnelly granted a motion to adjourn the conference on April 21, 2026. The order reflects ongoing procedural adjustments as the parties prepare for the injunction hearing.
Details about the underlying dispute remain unclear, as the docket and filings have not been publicly disclosed. The motion for preliminary injunction suggests one party seeks to prevent certain actions pending the case's resolution. Judge Donnelly’s involvement indicates the case is proceeding in a federal court, but the specific jurisdiction is not identified.
The adjournment could signal the need for additional time to gather evidence, negotiate, or address procedural issues before the court hears arguments on the injunction. The court’s order does not specify the reasons for the delay, but such postponements are common in complex litigation involving preliminary relief.
The case remains active, with no final rulings issued on the injunction or other substantive matters. The reset hearing will be the next major event, where the court will consider whether to grant or deny the preliminary injunction based on the parties’ presentations. This decision could significantly affect the case’s trajectory by shaping the parties’ conduct during litigation.
Observers should watch for filings ahead of the April 29 hearing, including briefs and evidentiary submissions. These documents will provide insight into the dispute’s core issues and the arguments each side plans to make. Judge Donnelly’s ruling after the hearing will clarify the court’s stance on the preliminary relief sought.
update What Changed This Week
receipt_long Source expand_more
ORDER granting 25 Motion to Adjourn Conference. The hearing on the motion for preliminary injunction is reset to April 29, 2026 at 11:00 a.m. in Courtroom 4G North. Ordered by Judge Ann M. Donnelly on 4/21/2026. (CES)
Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
Case Timeline
1 eventORDER granting 25 Motion to Adjourn Conference. The hearing on the motion for preliminary injunction is reset to April 29, 2026 at 11:00 a.m. in Courtroom 4G North. Ordered by Judge Ann M. Donnelly on 4/21/2026. (CES)
Judge Ann granted Motion to Adjourn Conference.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
1 day, 4 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.